From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
syzbot+a9ed3d9132939852d0df@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 bpf] bpf: Check the helper function is valid in get_helper_proto
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 16:18:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJ3wNQNodQhnt8GG@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aJ3qSru3r1is9lxy@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 03:53:14PM +0200, Paul Chaignon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 03:38:32PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
> >
> > syzbot reported an verifier bug [1] where the helper func pointer
> > could be NULL due to disabled config option.
> >
> > As Alexei suggested we could check on that in get_helper_proto
> > directly. Excluding tail_call helper from the check, because it
> > is NULL by design and valid in all configs.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/68904050.050a0220.7f033.0001.GAE@google.com/
> > Reported-by: syzbot+a9ed3d9132939852d0df@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>
> The same bug was reported before by the kernel test robot at
> https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202507160818.68358831-lkp@intel.com, so
> I guess we'll need:
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202507160818.68358831-lkp@intel.com
>
> With that,
>
> Acked-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
thanks, will fix
jirka
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-14 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-13 13:38 [PATCHv2 bpf] bpf: Check the helper function is valid in get_helper_proto Jiri Olsa
2025-08-13 22:44 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-08-14 7:29 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-08-14 13:53 ` Paul Chaignon
2025-08-14 14:18 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJ3wNQNodQhnt8GG@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=syzbot+a9ed3d9132939852d0df@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.