From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
irogers@google.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
maddy@linux.ibm.com, kjain@linux.ibm.com,
hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Aditya.Bodkhe1@ibm.com,
Tejas Manhas <tejas05@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/tests: Update perf record testcase to fix usage of affinity for machines with #CPUs > 1K
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 13:23:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJ5FvBa4LPhMO0u-@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250814114908.45648-1-atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 05:19:08PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> The perf record testcase fails on systems with more than 1K CPUs.
>
> Testcase: perf test -vv "PERF_RECORD_* events & perf_sample fields"
>
> PERF_RECORD_* events & perf_sample fields :
> --- start ---
> test child forked, pid 272482
> sched_getaffinity: Invalid argument
> sched__get_first_possible_cpu: Invalid argument
> test child finished with -1
> ---- end ----
> PERF_RECORD_* events & perf_sample fields: FAILED!
>
> sched__get_first_possible_cpu uses "sched_getaffinity" to get the
> cpumask and this call is returning EINVAL (Invalid argument).
> This happens because the default mask size in glibc is 1024. To
> overcome this 1024 CPUs mask size limitation of cpu_set_t, change the
> mask size using the CPU_*_S macros ie, use CPU_ALLOC to allocate
> cpumask, CPU_ALLOC_SIZE for size. Same fix needed for mask which is
> used to setaffinity so that mask size is large enough to represent
> number of possible CPU's in the system.
>
> Reported-by: Tejas Manhas <tejas05@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Namhyung
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c b/tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c
> index 0b3c37e66871..d895df037707 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c
> @@ -13,15 +13,19 @@
> #include "tests.h"
> #include "util/mmap.h"
> #include "util/sample.h"
> +#include "util/cpumap.h"
>
> static int sched__get_first_possible_cpu(pid_t pid, cpu_set_t *maskp)
> {
> - int i, cpu = -1, nrcpus = 1024;
> + int i, cpu = -1;
> + int nrcpus = cpu__max_cpu().cpu;
> + size_t size = CPU_ALLOC_SIZE(nrcpus);
> +
> realloc:
> - CPU_ZERO(maskp);
> + CPU_ZERO_S(size, maskp);
>
> - if (sched_getaffinity(pid, sizeof(*maskp), maskp) == -1) {
> - if (errno == EINVAL && nrcpus < (1024 << 8)) {
> + if (sched_getaffinity(pid, size, maskp) == -1) {
> + if (errno == EINVAL && nrcpus < (cpu__max_cpu().cpu << 8)) {
> nrcpus = nrcpus << 2;
> goto realloc;
> }
> @@ -30,11 +34,11 @@ static int sched__get_first_possible_cpu(pid_t pid, cpu_set_t *maskp)
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < nrcpus; i++) {
> - if (CPU_ISSET(i, maskp)) {
> + if (CPU_ISSET_S(i, size, maskp)) {
> if (cpu == -1)
> cpu = i;
> else
> - CPU_CLR(i, maskp);
> + CPU_CLR_S(i, size, maskp);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -50,8 +54,9 @@ static int test__PERF_RECORD(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest
> .no_buffering = true,
> .mmap_pages = 256,
> };
> - cpu_set_t cpu_mask;
> - size_t cpu_mask_size = sizeof(cpu_mask);
> + int nrcpus = cpu__max_cpu().cpu;
> + cpu_set_t *cpu_mask;
> + size_t cpu_mask_size;
> struct evlist *evlist = evlist__new_dummy();
> struct evsel *evsel;
> struct perf_sample sample;
> @@ -69,12 +74,22 @@ static int test__PERF_RECORD(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest
> int total_events = 0, nr_events[PERF_RECORD_MAX] = { 0, };
> char sbuf[STRERR_BUFSIZE];
>
> + cpu_mask = CPU_ALLOC(nrcpus);
> + if (!cpu_mask) {
> + pr_debug("failed to create cpumask\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + cpu_mask_size = CPU_ALLOC_SIZE(nrcpus);
> + CPU_ZERO_S(cpu_mask_size, cpu_mask);
> +
> perf_sample__init(&sample, /*all=*/false);
> if (evlist == NULL) /* Fallback for kernels lacking PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY */
> evlist = evlist__new_default();
>
> if (evlist == NULL) {
> pr_debug("Not enough memory to create evlist\n");
> + CPU_FREE(cpu_mask);
> goto out;
> }
>
> @@ -111,7 +126,7 @@ static int test__PERF_RECORD(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest
> evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, TIME);
> evlist__config(evlist, &opts, NULL);
>
> - err = sched__get_first_possible_cpu(evlist->workload.pid, &cpu_mask);
> + err = sched__get_first_possible_cpu(evlist->workload.pid, cpu_mask);
> if (err < 0) {
> pr_debug("sched__get_first_possible_cpu: %s\n",
> str_error_r(errno, sbuf, sizeof(sbuf)));
> @@ -123,7 +138,7 @@ static int test__PERF_RECORD(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest
> /*
> * So that we can check perf_sample.cpu on all the samples.
> */
> - if (sched_setaffinity(evlist->workload.pid, cpu_mask_size, &cpu_mask) < 0) {
> + if (sched_setaffinity(evlist->workload.pid, cpu_mask_size, cpu_mask) < 0) {
> pr_debug("sched_setaffinity: %s\n",
> str_error_r(errno, sbuf, sizeof(sbuf)));
> goto out_delete_evlist;
> @@ -328,6 +343,7 @@ static int test__PERF_RECORD(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest
> ++errs;
> }
> out_delete_evlist:
> + CPU_FREE(cpu_mask);
> evlist__delete(evlist);
> out:
> perf_sample__exit(&sample);
> --
> 2.43.7
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-14 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-14 11:49 [PATCH] tools/perf/tests: Update perf record testcase to fix usage of affinity for machines with #CPUs > 1K Athira Rajeev
2025-08-14 12:23 ` Venkat
2025-08-14 20:23 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2025-08-20 17:20 ` Athira Rajeev
2025-09-10 5:56 ` Athira Rajeev
2025-09-10 17:46 ` Ian Rogers
2025-09-13 14:51 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-09-15 15:40 ` Athira Rajeev
2025-08-19 11:56 ` tejas05
2025-08-20 17:22 ` Athira Rajeev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJ5FvBa4LPhMO0u-@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=Aditya.Bodkhe1@ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tejas05@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.