From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>, Gu Bowen <gubowen5@huawei.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Lu Jialin <lujialin4@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix possible deadlock in console_trylock_spinning
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 19:28:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJD72syGyJs203Mw@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <o2gpvdtxqrdfrsbayorvzvjqcreb45puojpgfye7dimbuuvbdt@gxquukahrxo7>
On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 05:34:10AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 01:08:15PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> > I'm surprised we haven't seen these until recently. Has printk always
> > allocated memory?
>
> I can talk about netconsole, and the answer is yes!
>
> weird enought, lockdep never picked this issue, and I have a few set of
> hosts running kmemleak and lockdep for a while.
>
> This time was different because I have decided to invstiage the code,
> and found the deadlock. Still, no lockdep complain at all.
I guess it's because kmemleak is quiet in general, unless problems are
found, and lockdep never registered this combination - printk() called
with the kmemleak_lock held.
Thanks for investigating.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-04 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-30 9:49 [PATCH] mm: Fix possible deadlock in console_trylock_spinning Gu Bowen
2025-08-01 22:33 ` Andrew Morton
2025-08-02 3:09 ` Waiman Long
2025-08-02 3:53 ` Andrew Morton
2025-08-04 12:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-04 12:34 ` Breno Leitao
2025-08-04 18:28 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-08-05 7:44 ` Gu Bowen
2025-08-06 15:34 ` John Ogness
2025-08-07 3:22 ` Gu Bowen
2025-08-01 23:52 ` Andrew Morton
2025-08-11 14:33 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJD72syGyJs203Mw@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gubowen5@huawei.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.