From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: dmkhn@proton.me
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
anthony.perard@vates.tech, jbeulich@suse.com, julien@xen.org,
michal.orzel@amd.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, dmukhin@ford.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] x86/domain: allocate d->{iomem,irq}_caps before arch-specific initialization
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 16:37:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJNoo6s_7CV6tIjy@macbook.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250731192130.3948419-4-dmukhin@ford.com>
On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 07:21:54PM +0000, dmkhn@proton.me wrote:
> From: Denis Mukhin <dmukhin@ford.com>
>
> Move IRQ/IOMEM rangesets allocation before arch_domain_create().
>
> That guarantees that arch-specific code could access those rangesets to
> register traps for emulation.
>
> It is necessary for those emulators registering trap handlers and ensuring
> that emulated IRQs are not shared with the physical IRQs.
>
> Move dom0_setup_permissions() call right after I/O rangesets are allocated.
>
> Move pvh_setup_mmcfg() inside dom0_setup_permissions() close to the place
> where MMCFG ranges are initialized.
I'm a bit puzzled by this, you don't need I/O permission to setup
traps. You can setup traps everywhere, the I/O rangesets control
whether a domain can access the physical resource, not whether
accesses can be emulated.
The dependency between MMCFG registration (pvh_setup_mmcfg()) and
calling dom0_setup_permissions() is because the later consumes the
MMCFG ranges added by the former to mark them as not accessible by
a PVH dom0.
I think you don't need this for vUARTS, as the ports are know at build
time, and hence you can block access to them without requiring the
actual vUART to be initialized.
Thanks, Roger.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-06 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-31 19:21 [PATCH v4 0/8] x86: introduce NS16550-compatible UART emulator dmkhn
2025-07-31 19:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] xen/domain: introduce common emulation flags dmkhn
2025-08-04 9:46 ` Jan Beulich
2025-08-05 0:54 ` dmkhn
2025-08-06 13:56 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-08-07 17:54 ` dmkhn
2025-08-07 14:28 ` Oleksii Kurochko
2025-08-07 17:43 ` dmkhn
2025-07-31 19:21 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] emul/vuart: introduce framework for UART emulators dmkhn
2025-08-01 0:08 ` Stefano Stabellini
2025-08-01 2:54 ` dmkhn
2025-08-04 10:11 ` Jan Beulich
2025-08-09 18:55 ` dmkhn
2025-08-11 7:34 ` Jan Beulich
2025-08-11 23:55 ` dmkhn
2025-08-12 6:52 ` Jan Beulich
2025-08-14 6:32 ` dmkhn
2025-08-06 14:24 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-08-07 19:12 ` dmkhn
2025-07-31 19:21 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] x86/domain: allocate d->{iomem,irq}_caps before arch-specific initialization dmkhn
2025-07-31 19:52 ` Grygorii Strashko
2025-07-31 20:21 ` dmkhn
2025-08-01 2:57 ` dmkhn
2025-07-31 23:20 ` Stefano Stabellini
2025-08-04 10:20 ` Jan Beulich
2025-08-07 18:59 ` dmkhn
2025-08-06 14:37 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2025-08-07 18:57 ` dmkhn
2025-07-31 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] xen/8250-uart: update definitions dmkhn
2025-07-31 23:23 ` Stefano Stabellini
2025-08-04 10:23 ` Jan Beulich
2025-08-07 19:41 ` dmkhn
2025-07-31 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] emul/vuart-ns16550: introduce NS16550-compatible UART emulator (x86) dmkhn
2025-07-31 23:57 ` Stefano Stabellini
2025-08-01 3:28 ` dmkhn
2025-08-04 10:53 ` Jan Beulich
2025-08-09 18:37 ` dmkhn
2025-08-11 7:39 ` Jan Beulich
2025-08-12 0:06 ` dmkhn
2025-08-06 15:06 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-08-06 17:24 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-08-07 18:49 ` dmkhn
2025-07-31 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] tools/xl: enable NS16550-compatible UART emulator for HVM (x86) dmkhn
2025-08-04 10:54 ` Jan Beulich
2025-08-06 15:21 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-08-25 14:49 ` Anthony PERARD
2025-08-25 15:03 ` Jan Beulich
2025-08-25 15:13 ` Anthony PERARD
2025-08-25 15:27 ` Jan Beulich
2025-08-25 15:39 ` Anthony PERARD
2025-08-25 15:45 ` Jan Beulich
2025-08-26 9:26 ` dmkhn
2025-07-31 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] tools/xl: enable NS16550-compatible UART emulator for PVH (x86) dmkhn
2025-08-01 0:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2025-08-01 1:53 ` dmkhn
2025-08-04 11:06 ` Jan Beulich
2025-08-07 19:38 ` dmkhn
2025-07-31 19:22 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] emul/vuart: introduce console forwarding enforcement via vUART dmkhn
2025-08-01 0:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
2025-08-01 1:51 ` dmkhn
2025-08-06 13:48 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] x86: introduce NS16550-compatible UART emulator Roger Pau Monné
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJNoo6s_7CV6tIjy@macbook.local \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=anthony.perard@vates.tech \
--cc=dmkhn@proton.me \
--cc=dmukhin@ford.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=michal.orzel@amd.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.