All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
	 "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: locking/futex] futex: Use RCU-based per-CPU reference counting instead of rcuref_t
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 19:38:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJ_vEP2EHj6l0xRT@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <175225881640.406.2875698205071601878.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>

On Fri, Jul 11, 2025, tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> The following commit has been merged into the locking/futex branch of tip:
> 
> Commit-ID:     56180dd20c19e5b0fa34822997a9ac66b517e7b3
> Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/56180dd20c19e5b0fa34822997a9ac66b517e7b3
> Author:        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> AuthorDate:    Thu, 10 Jul 2025 13:00:07 +02:00
> Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> CommitterDate: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 16:02:00 +02:00
> 
> futex: Use RCU-based per-CPU reference counting instead of rcuref_t
> 
> The use of rcuref_t for reference counting introduces a performance bottleneck
> when accessed concurrently by multiple threads during futex operations.
> 
> Replace rcuref_t with special crafted per-CPU reference counters. The
> lifetime logic remains the same.
> 
> The newly allocate private hash starts in FR_PERCPU state. In this state, each
> futex operation that requires the private hash uses a per-CPU counter (an
> unsigned int) for incrementing or decrementing the reference count.
> 
> When the private hash is about to be replaced, the per-CPU counters are
> migrated to a atomic_t counter mm_struct::futex_atomic.
> The migration process:
> - Waiting for one RCU grace period to ensure all users observe the
>   current private hash. This can be skipped if a grace period elapsed
>   since the private hash was assigned.
> 
> - futex_private_hash::state is set to FR_ATOMIC, forcing all users to
>   use mm_struct::futex_atomic for reference counting.
> 
> - After a RCU grace period, all users are guaranteed to be using the
>   atomic counter. The per-CPU counters can now be summed up and added to
>   the atomic_t counter. If the resulting count is zero, the hash can be
>   safely replaced. Otherwise, active users still hold a valid reference.
> 
> - Once the atomic reference count drops to zero, the next futex
>   operation will switch to the new private hash.
> 
> call_rcu_hurry() is used to speed up transition which otherwise might be
> delay with RCU_LAZY. There is nothing wrong with using call_rcu(). The
> side effects would be that on auto scaling the new hash is used later
> and the SET_SLOTS prctl() will block longer.
> 
> [bigeasy: commit description + mm get/ put_async]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250710110011.384614-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de
> ---

This is causing explosions on my test systems, in code that doesn't obviously
have anything to do with futex.

The most common symptom is a #GP on this code in try_to_wake_up():

		/* Link @node into the waitqueue. */
		WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node);

although on systems with 5-level paging I _think_ it just manifests as hard
hanges (I assume because prev->next is corrupted, but is still canonical with
LA57?  But that's a wild guess).

The failure always occurs when userspace writes /sys/module/kvm/parameters/nx_huge_pages,
but I don't think there's anything KVM specific about the issue.  Simply writing
the param doesn't explode, the problem only arises when I'm running tests in
parallel (but then failure is almost immediate), so presumably there's a task
migration angle or something?

Manually disabling CONFIG_FUTEX_PRIVATE_HASH makes the problem go away, and
running with CONFIG_FUTEX_PRIVATE_HASH=y prior to this rework is also fine.  So
it appears that the problem is specifically in the new code.

I can provide more info as needed next week.

Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xff0e899fa1566052: 0000 [#1] SMP
CPU: 51 UID: 0 PID: 53807 Comm: tee Tainted: G S         O        6.17.0-smp--38183c31756a-next #826 NONE 
Tainted: [S]=CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC, [O]=OOT_MODULE
Hardware name: Google LLC Indus/Indus_QC_03, BIOS 30.110.0 09/13/2024
RIP: 0010:queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x123/0x250
Code: d8 c1 e8 10 66 87 47 02 66 85 c0 74 40 0f b7 c0 89 c2 83 e2 03 c1 e2 04 83 e0 fc 48 c7 c6 f8 ff ff ff 48 8b 84 46 a0 e2 a3 a0 <48> 89 8c 02 c0 da 47 a2 83 79 08 00 75 08 f3 90 83 79 08 00 74 f8
RSP: 0018:ffffbf55cffe7cf8 EFLAGS: 00010006
RAX: ff0e899fff0e8562 RBX: 0000000000d00000 RCX: ffffa39b40aefac0
RDX: 0000000000000030 RSI: fffffffffffffff8 RDI: ffffa39d0592e68c
RBP: 0000000000d00000 R08: 00000000ffffff80 R09: 0000000400000000
R10: ffffa36cce4fe401 R11: 0000000000000800 R12: 0000000000000003
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffa39d0592e68c R15: ffffa39b9e672000
FS:  00007f233b2e9740(0000) GS:ffffa39b9e672000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f233b39fda0 CR3: 00000004d031f002 CR4: 00000000007726f0
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x60
 try_to_wake_up+0x4f/0x5d0
 set_nx_huge_pages+0xe4/0x1c0 [kvm]
 param_attr_store+0x89/0xf0
 module_attr_store+0x1e/0x30
 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xe4/0x160
 vfs_write+0x2cb/0x420
 ksys_write+0x7f/0xf0
 do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x1f0
 ? arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x9/0x50
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
RIP: 0033:0x7f233b4178b3
Code: cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc 48 8b 05 99 91 07 00 83 38 00 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 4d c3 55 48 89 e5 41 57 41 56 53 50 48 89 d3
RSP: 002b:00007ffffbdbf3b8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007f233b4178b3
RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 00007ffffbdbf4a0 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007ffffbdbf3e0 R08: 0000000000001004 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 00000000000001b6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffffbdbf4a0
R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 00000000226ff3d0 R15: 0000000000000002
 </TASK>
Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass vfat fat i2c_mux_pca954x i2c_mux spidev cdc_acm xhci_pci xhci_hcd gq(O) sha3_generic
gsmi: Log Shutdown Reason 0x03
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
RIP: 0010:queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x123/0x250
Code: d8 c1 e8 10 66 87 47 02 66 85 c0 74 40 0f b7 c0 89 c2 83 e2 03 c1 e2 04 83 e0 fc 48 c7 c6 f8 ff ff ff 48 8b 84 46 a0 e2 a3 a0 <48> 89 8c 02 c0 da 47 a2 83 79 08 00 75 08 f3 90 83 79 08 00 74 f8
RSP: 0018:ffffbf55cffe7cf8 EFLAGS: 00010006
RAX: ff0e899fff0e8562 RBX: 0000000000d00000 RCX: ffffa39b40aefac0
RDX: 0000000000000030 RSI: fffffffffffffff8 RDI: ffffa39d0592e68c
RBP: 0000000000d00000 R08: 00000000ffffff80 R09: 0000000400000000
R10: ffffa36cce4fe401 R11: 0000000000000800 R12: 0000000000000003
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffa39d0592e68c R15: ffffa39b9e672000
FS:  00007f233b2e9740(0000) GS:ffffa39b9e672000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f233b39fda0 CR3: 00000004d031f002 CR4: 00000000007726f0
PKRU: 55555554
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
Kernel Offset: 0x1e600000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff)
gsmi: Log Shutdown Reason 0x02
Rebooting in 10 seconds..


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-16  2:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-10 11:00 [PATCH v2 0/6] futex: Use RCU-based per-CPU reference counting Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-10 11:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] selftests/futex: Adapt the private hash test to RCU related changes Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-11 18:33   ` [tip: locking/futex] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-10 11:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] futex: Use RCU-based per-CPU reference counting instead of rcuref_t Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-11 18:33   ` [tip: locking/futex] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-16  2:38     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-08-26  0:38       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-07-30 12:20   ` [PATCH v2 2/6] " André Draszik
2025-07-30 19:44     ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-01 14:59       ` André Draszik
2025-08-02 13:22       ` [tip: locking/urgent] futex: Move futex cleanup to __mmdrop() tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-21 17:39         ` Breno Leitao
2025-07-10 11:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] futex: Make futex_private_hash_get() static Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-11 18:33   ` [tip: locking/futex] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-10 11:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] futex: Remove support for IMMUTABLE Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-11 18:33   ` [tip: locking/futex] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-10 11:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] selftests/futex: " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-11 18:33   ` [tip: locking/futex] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-10 11:00 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] perf bench futex: " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-11 18:33   ` [tip: locking/futex] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-15 15:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] futex: Use RCU-based per-CPU reference counting Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-15 16:31   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-15 17:04     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-16 14:29       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-16 18:21         ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-06  9:29           ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-06 11:09             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-11-06 11:23               ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-06 20:17                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-11-06 11:40             ` [tip: locking/urgent] futex: Optimize per-cpu " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-06 15:26               ` Shrikanth Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aJ_vEP2EHj6l0xRT@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.