From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f181.google.com (mail-pf1-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15E4A1367 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2025 02:04:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.181 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754791485; cv=none; b=SkJvyWzK0V48r7ZJI8znRMlhpo1mLNh01E7DI30e1h/iL+fNA6wHPd7PxE4x+I26DKeqDXvcu0VMXDQQZT79mGiBPgNvwuu+d3oHClzm5Gjec6FyW4DognhhxQeBrPII+okiFUqDc+jXoF3AUO5jfsCrLRA/TpfJ5aadgw7vjS4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754791485; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5B9EcPlaYkNFgWW2w0IjOvRGR5xFsqb+684FjwZuIdw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=b/x+NI2rl7Yo/pXflKNXPtLzKbgTtHU+/VuB5zKAc8BtQ4gJ767LQ8qVXTvpS0UlxHFg2CqXzXGN3AwOt2N0IZI+A4PNieB5K0t/A7q3Q3iRa0ZtOB8vqsUeg95haUEK63v3gOhb/dMWoWU/fvX6ooKbpyuY6ZtCq5zEdivgXwE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dama.to; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dama.to; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dama-to.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@dama-to.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=qaIyKwLI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.181 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dama.to Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dama.to Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dama-to.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@dama-to.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="qaIyKwLI" Received: by mail-pf1-f181.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-76c3607d960so3556038b3a.1 for ; Sat, 09 Aug 2025 19:04:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dama-to.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1754791483; x=1755396283; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PpEDcR/rY+YXUvIHTjoMmFXmGhwOZhEhJLky7Dw6ZkA=; b=qaIyKwLIV9p9uK/AqsiUY2LWiLIoFnpGOyUbNIM2mY+5onKztlemdtQfwV/giuu0nk GTBFkn2l3j3pp3rzdqEXRplOlYvnwnaN45PuDpVnG8hqDmth9Qd/4b4PTt6q2NscuOzP OGNuwaOq1PO6V0P5078ERdHJoTHT+GvDhj5trAEgBv1CVjpWp6az9biNKEiik7SqkCvQ 5tgaHq58RUv0eOyQtNI9xZQ1zSb33k/4tYpTUsUDie8iwrPPdxrp045MVmcl7sz9OOdx pG041gidt7jPmGkby+uUNuH8xnapuhEOyEn3nDMkrsnV+Ye+1dPtMZvA+YGV7h+zatA7 kW7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1754791483; x=1755396283; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PpEDcR/rY+YXUvIHTjoMmFXmGhwOZhEhJLky7Dw6ZkA=; b=JZexJ+v+Rw5w3CwpYjJV6666ZogJsKpxBnWE2qBj3wFf+YUvls7n12LAh9LZlSPugy Q3CNC0blwT6BQ6EY6fvLGuOjXJa9MZ371jMb/PQf0Pu6LF94HipIiQtZZG36W48LMVpf s1BY1Fu4+qv0VOoARCpjWVUUqoHrkX0GjO73tHrrQ342GuXGatHq/tqEqEyb2913D3rz YqD2jgpmcDSXBpiCbok7cW62V2QCxPLLrnEBZtatrEL9jvRKMQCmxCD46ZPu8uSqtHKe BM/A+77YKQe0AkOgzsnfigPRdmzTGe9yTKwLMhtmbtR9N1uF41TMIugSClrUNUp2WgGw L5Ag== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVmHNNeTB+1KCXz2/I3ew0XuCZX9EHw6K4v/jirDoJtkdpfMifJFqNz8kbelr+/X3OpASR9WIgauYY/ur6nkbc=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxTibiTjv2EraZFOfjiVhYhuldOWobeguiz1l4/CA1wZy3514rV BFmLh1OUfcaetWONjBrmy0p43D2B/lRpixq7RxfabFhQSnJwmRGPjhu4C9ep5GsGZd8= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuLuYmCY4h3yFwK2uq9qxFa/HinWG986g7fNe/JwwkSZnr5ukV+ysZZVIhHOPG HJEXNa6YqNNP5sZt733CTSjLxYP0+mTiNpLO5+yrO9aiFCFdc91k7mitiKJxSepvY0yhNPSeUau txoARgoagCy3mk6Spji/ZEI/A1xuz0KFStp270338/RWYo9oVKboUgIM0BzBmy6kQB3VdzL6MHL ywdtTVXopIz0k2Zejtay1dS5e++2vyIiaLBSp5epTmAUw9C7nv4qRMg0wOmzkwc7IIidh9WvxRp AZqg/adskafR0mHJraTpq1jWGIdG+gf6AuQvqPS3WeqXG2ayUMh73Z6zia4lpNjjInQCfyWeWMh CKX62NGbI49NEanUuQSfZfwOthac+mQfnWar4nU0Z3I1o1Py+1fxhHnaO+wr0808Oo/Y6dvPX X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH9l+G3vC9KcZ3JXNHknQZtzhkwAF36rtgqVKo/+BrNtn3ph8Wz2bBk6bfnDChBVuLFaLwxXQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:6d94:b0:240:1bdb:bed2 with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-240551be2a1mr12886194637.32.1754791483437; Sat, 09 Aug 2025 19:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MacBook-Air.local (c-73-222-201-58.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.222.201.58]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-76bd7887522sm22372207b3a.20.2025.08.09.19.04.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 09 Aug 2025 19:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2025 19:04:40 -0700 From: Joe Damato To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, skhawaja@google.com, sdf@fomichev.me, shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/3] net: update NAPI threaded config even for disabled NAPIs Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Joe Damato , Jakub Kicinski , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, skhawaja@google.com, sdf@fomichev.me, shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org References: <20250809001205.1147153-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20250809001205.1147153-3-kuba@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250809001205.1147153-3-kuba@kernel.org> On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 05:12:04PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > We chose not to have an "unset" state for threaded, and not to wipe > the NAPI config clean when channels are explicitly disabled. Yea... I wonder if we could change that now or if it's too late? I think this is the thing you mentioned that I couldn't recall in my response to the cover letter. > This means the persistent config structs "exist" even when their NAPIs > are not instantiated. > > Differently put - the NAPI persistent state lives in the net_device > (ncfg == struct napi_config): > > ,--- [napi 0] - [napi 1] > [dev] | | > `--- [ncfg 0] - [ncfg 1] > > so say we a device with 2 queues but only 1 enabled: > > ,--- [napi 0] > [dev] | > `--- [ncfg 0] - [ncfg 1] > > now we set the device to threaded=1: > > ,---------- [napi 0 (thr:1)] > [dev(thr:1)] | > `---------- [ncfg 0 (thr:1)] - [ncfg 1 (thr:?)] > > Since [ncfg 1] was not attached to a NAPI during configuration we > skipped it. If we create a NAPI for it later it will have the old > setting (presumably disabled). One could argue if this is right > or not "in principle", but it's definitely not how things worked > before per-NAPI config.. Thanks for the detailed commit message. I agree that it should probably work the same now. > Fixes: 2677010e7793 ("Add support to set NAPI threaded for individual NAPI") > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski > --- > v2: add missing kdoc > --- > include/linux/netdevice.h | 5 ++++- > net/core/dev.c | 7 ++++++- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Joe Damato