From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Evangelos Petrongonas <epetron@amazon.de>
Cc: ardb@kernel.org, Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
Changyuan Lyu <changyuanl@google.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, nh-open-source@amazon.com,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: Support booting with kexec handover (KHO)
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:39:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJmQNuQxLLtXjq2r@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250808163651.25279-1-epetron@amazon.de>
On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 04:36:51PM +0000, Evangelos Petrongonas wrote:
> When KHO (Kexec HandOver) is enabled, it sets up scratch memory regions
> early during device tree scanning. After kexec, the new kernel
> exclusively uses this region for memory allocations during boot up to
> the initialization of the page allocator
>
> However, when booting with EFI, EFI's reserve_regions() uses
> memblock_remove(0, PHYS_ADDR_MAX) to clear all memory regions before
> rebuilding them from EFI data. This destroys KHO scratch regions and
> their flags, thus causing a kernel panic, as there are no scratch
> memory regions.
>
> Instead of wholesale removal, iterate through memory regions and only
> remove non-KHO ones. This preserves KHO scratch regions while still
> allowing EFI to rebuild its memory map.
It's worth mentioning that scratch areas are "good known memory" :)
> Signed-off-by: Evangelos Petrongonas <epetron@amazon.de>
> ---
>
> Reproduction/Verification Steps
> The issue and the fix can be reproduced/verified by booting a VM with
> EFI and attempting to perform a KHO enabled kexec. The fix
> was developed/tested on arm64.
>
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c
> index a00e07b853f22..2f08b1ab764f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c
> @@ -164,12 +164,35 @@ static __init void reserve_regions(void)
> pr_info("Processing EFI memory map:\n");
>
> /*
> - * Discard memblocks discovered so far: if there are any at this
> - * point, they originate from memory nodes in the DT, and UEFI
> - * uses its own memory map instead.
> + * Discard memblocks discovered so far except for KHO scratch regions.
> + * Most memblocks at this point originate from memory nodes in the DT,
> + * and UEFI uses its own memory map instead. However, if KHO is enabled,
> + * scratch regions must be preserved.
> */
> memblock_dump_all();
> - memblock_remove(0, PHYS_ADDR_MAX);
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH)) {
It's better to condition this on kho_get_fdt() that means that we are
actually doing a handover.
> + struct memblock_region *reg;
> + phys_addr_t start, size;
> + int i;
> +
> + /* Remove all non-KHO regions */
> + for (i = memblock.memory.cnt - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
Please use for_each_mem_region()
> + reg = &memblock.memory.regions[i];
> + if (!memblock_is_kho_scratch(reg)) {
> + start = reg->base;
> + size = reg->size;
> + memblock_remove(start, size);
> + }
> + }
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * KHO is disabled. Discard memblocks discovered so far: if there
> + * are any at this point, they originate from memory nodes in the
> + * DT, and UEFI uses its own memory map instead.
> + */
> + memblock_remove(0, PHYS_ADDR_MAX);
> + }
>
> for_each_efi_memory_desc(md) {
> paddr = md->phys_addr;
> --
> 2.43.0
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-11 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-08 16:36 [PATCH] efi: Support booting with kexec handover (KHO) Evangelos Petrongonas
2025-08-11 6:39 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-08-14 0:53 ` Evangelos Petrongonas
2025-08-14 8:51 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJmQNuQxLLtXjq2r@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=changyuanl@google.com \
--cc=epetron@amazon.de \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nh-open-source@amazon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.