From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f175.google.com (mail-pl1-f175.google.com [209.85.214.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D80892E2856 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 18:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.175 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754937795; cv=none; b=c9S+2bX4YkxtQH7sUgxrZJMOOAmbzarhamGIpxB7zAt0RPzH3BBY/UaxaO/4hdOWY+5CLC4x0YZdi99zKBbU+BXUZTcrKvvt/a3rp5Q4bNPQAI9gnGu4+BDuuzpdP7+jeH+vGVgzrBNvXzMhFZF6g5AvxwrcYEokmrBFRRvCsIU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754937795; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ehBzBrmpO6FFQHQkSJbU+IofYnPjC/m9CjtUMtSr3h0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=F9HOOPuZJwmk5j5i+XbfJN2ef7X4XVkC1b7P1udIM8V4W/FZwJDaLyXeO9/NB0MsF4n6393/NzOuFlUVZkjgJ2/GeM72YMi3sb/RoUz/2l68eKck8S48AeqqWqsuZC9tQeNW7w8+iNxcpKUZGh2Cbq8hlHv3oVVplwximgBX63o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=3PvomAh9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.175 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="3PvomAh9" Received: by mail-pl1-f175.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-242d1e947feso35265ad.0 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:43:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1754937793; x=1755542593; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NMlOINz7dBI+CDnsCWZItvlMGoxrFbP7xNOE0bRZ508=; b=3PvomAh9dqdQ69rJTOSXAmlfxkqciRrRVQRopG0nhcWtYVTy9df6q57ktQiZBcuVAZ M2EoQuccX/x/jjt+AFz7KY7x0mnDVw1Le0JZptWzUxlj+fnulPN2pLGQLdfmPdwjaSBv D0kvdxkXYVN1eLRG2M+YlY6i4nr8q6In3pYebDYEYQ/jE7GYtjeTVC728cbOhKH5vm2r 3obBivJIw4WUCo6O8zwE3E624GwZpvJJ+sNAbAWsZMZhHisshZkmktjlblB7adGIrczv 1IY/aUVs9RbQFdlhBEABRHSukgHBvedFHmY8b96jqqWcx25xdTi0Ul/xmkpF+C0df4c+ lNYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1754937793; x=1755542593; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=NMlOINz7dBI+CDnsCWZItvlMGoxrFbP7xNOE0bRZ508=; b=H1dFlMDcnhHk0uFJL3dk/noSOkMiy+X8GnuZFnvk7Rcp9vEj8GU2KckFfYN/wbh2b4 DtBMk/Lr5b++u0bDE/ZFVrm3RcEU8v5XWz13mhWMygvg4AMVk8ZIc6simb3bjz9bSq2v XbR+OKUEHwIvP9eEJVNtqbhaTGZA/bOClLvRQDj94ecgpxfZIdyb38ELtzhASYOnfuXX 8w1/jIn6rwcIfq2Ib5RiuFm84FOkS8x82jpP0VkQTihNd/xrtx0AucKzXeuMez+x4mSn EkRAPhyp5b/I9gJUFUW2k8Xe6RzrlsynEYYf1yxFKth4Wxr/pHGEnOHwbaKWT+Ujsvvu mqWw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW7ZtcDXWRnPPz329oWgZZyzpFGnznNUr8jTCtm5Grap+XPr4h4WMj+l1MlwIzuo8s6c5sxQXjV8g==@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxKUyPBxBGPesvJtn0hKM+CeJsJK2eLFdZaYuEYsAsj0TT5rAUO 8p+T25NswcXV3sOz6cIxAKKtUsJqveHPSeKaqTa47Nguep3cFdb1BcotjbbtkK/Plw== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvXXwq0+/WnmX1DvsS9DC4vn4AfKUH87AY0VMZRX6nzVMKmLf1IznM9VUrQ6aA T70Hl8m6QwPc8LpDs0sxYZUq2sPKSvgNXhNCwL/8v6wa/H76+Bbxsl/2VlTNBcRo8QCadDcgStS sOL3eRlFozIoG+Xn02mGuFFwH/AWk2sFHZmUWxC1WtUAU234Wfrw9LA+1rp5YRQV1ZmzJkQOlR3 7pe0G80qVv/xyMQKJX3jWwY2OjriWJACmDhDp02qB3U1EOqZGFK1N1nh9vbqck0FKs+whq+7TdL xfGhPES7wuqBh7nk+Gl9npW1OlZcIFHLHgxW4X7SrzZpBlmR9ZMtiCpRsaNwYVX15folwwu+ewW u/aMFnsER6vXFKhGGXRtu4Isl9LsyyrlIh9gySKmiono4bHuGDoy5zQ8jhgjUCg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFAj4RXchFFM1jNvlG+vT/TTAhPz8TKJKfTAJWiNhb+yc1od3gDo0I+qfsY9ggR5R/DTUlTOg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:234d:b0:23d:eb0f:f49 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-242fd374f19mr359875ad.14.1754937792802; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:43:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (167.212.233.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.233.212.167]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-321611da39esm15268859a91.2.2025.08.11.11.43.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:43:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 18:43:08 +0000 From: Prashant Malani To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Beata Michalska , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jie Zhan , Ionela Voinescu , Ben Segall , Dietmar Eggemann , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , open list , "open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK" , Mel Gorman , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Valentin Schneider , Vincent Guittot , z00813676 , sudeep.holla@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: CPPC: Dont read counters for idle CPUs Message-ID: References: <20250722032727.zmdwj6ztitkmr4pf@vireshk-i7> <20250731111324.vv6vsh35enk3gg4h@vireshk-i7> <20250801044340.6ycskhhkzenkzt7a@vireshk-i7> <20250811060551.ylc6uutni4x6jqtg@vireshk-i7> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250811060551.ylc6uutni4x6jqtg@vireshk-i7> On Aug 11 11:35, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 06-08-25, 17:19, Prashant Malani wrote: > > So, do we have consensus that the idle check is acceptable as proposed? > > (Just want to make sure this thread doesn't get lost given another thread > > has forked off in this conversation). > > I don't have any objections to this or a better solution to this. Thanks Viresh! Beata, can we kindly move ahead with the idle optimization (which is this series), while we continue discussions for the "under load" scenarios on the other thread? BR,