From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
david@redhat.com, philmd@linaro.org, mtosatti@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] hpet: switch to fain-grained device locking
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:56:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJoSlCDCy5IEZgko@x1.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250808120137.2208800-4-imammedo@redhat.com>
On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 02:01:30PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> as a step towards lock-less HPET counter read,
> use per device locking instead of BQL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-11 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-08 12:01 [PATCH v3 00/10] Reinvent BQL-free PIO/MMIO Igor Mammedov
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] memory: reintroduce BQL-free fine-grained PIO/MMIO Igor Mammedov
2025-08-08 12:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-08 14:36 ` Igor Mammedov
2025-08-08 15:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-11 12:08 ` Igor Mammedov
2025-08-11 15:54 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] acpi: mark PMTIMER as unlocked Igor Mammedov
2025-08-11 15:55 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] hpet: switch to fain-grained device locking Igor Mammedov
2025-08-11 15:56 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] hpet: move out main counter read into a separate block Igor Mammedov
2025-08-11 15:56 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] hpet: make main counter read lock-less Igor Mammedov
2025-08-11 15:58 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] introduce cpu_test_interrupt() that will replace open coded checks Igor Mammedov
2025-08-11 16:31 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-12 15:00 ` Igor Mammedov
2025-08-12 16:10 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] x86: kvm: use cpu_test_interrupt() instead of oppen coding checks Igor Mammedov
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] kvm: i386: irqchip: take BQL only if there is an interrupt Igor Mammedov
2025-08-11 16:22 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] use cpu_test_interrupt() instead of oppen coding checks tree wide Igor Mammedov
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] tcg: move interrupt caching and single step masking closer to user Igor Mammedov
2025-08-11 5:36 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] Reinvent BQL-free PIO/MMIO Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJoSlCDCy5IEZgko@x1.local \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.