All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org,
	oliver.upton@linux.dev, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
	robh@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	joey.gouly@arm.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com, ahmed.genidi@arm.com,
	kevin.brodsky@arm.com, scott@os.amperecomputing.com,
	mbenes@suse.cz, james.clark@linaro.org, frederic@kernel.org,
	rafael@kernel.org, pavel@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] arm64: initialise SCTLR2_ELx register at boot time
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 20:23:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJpDQ71/f9zdwXbf@e129823.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86pld190l2.wl-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,

> [dropping ry111@xry111.site, which bounces]
>
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2025 17:33:36 +0100,
> Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > add initialisation for SCTRL2_ELx register at boot time.
>
> Again, please expand.

Okay.


[...]
> >
> > +.macro __init_el2_sctlr2
>
> Writing this as __init_sctlr2_el2 would read vastly better (yes, I
> know most macros in this file are similarly braindead).
>
> > +	.macro init_sctlr2_elx, el, tmp
> > +	mrs_s	\tmp, SYS_ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1
> > +	ubfx	\tmp, \tmp, #ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1_SCTLRX_SHIFT, #4
> > +	cbz	\tmp, .Lskip_sctlr2_\@
> > +	.if	\el == 2
> > +	mov_q	\tmp, INIT_SCTLR2_EL2
> > +	msr_s	SYS_SCTLR_EL2, \tmp
> > +	.else
> > +	mov_q	\tmp, INIT_SCTLR2_EL1
> > +	.if	\el == 12
> > +	msr_s	SYS_SCTLR_EL12, \tmp
> > +	.else
> > +	msr_s	SYS_SCTLR_EL1, \tmp
> > +	.endif
>
> I don't think this is the correct place for this macro.
> asm/assembler.h seems more suitable, and already has that sort of
> things.

Thanks for letting me know the proper place.
I'll rewrite it on there.

>
> > +	.endif
> > +.Lskip_sctlr2_\@:
> > +	.endm
> >  #else
> >
> >  #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> > index ca04b338cb0d..0dff7593e50b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> > @@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(init_el1, SYM_L_LOCAL)
> >  	mov_q	x0, INIT_SCTLR_EL1_MMU_OFF
> >  	pre_disable_mmu_workaround
> >  	msr	sctlr_el1, x0
> > +	init_sctlr2_elx	1, x0
> >  	isb
> >  	mov_q	x0, INIT_PSTATE_EL1
> >  	msr	spsr_el1, x0
> > @@ -298,7 +299,6 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(init_el2, SYM_L_LOCAL)
> >  	msr	sctlr_el2, x0
> >  	isb
> >  0:
> > -
> >  	init_el2_hcr	HCR_HOST_NVHE_FLAGS
> >  	init_el2_state
> >
> > @@ -315,12 +315,15 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(init_el2, SYM_L_LOCAL)
> >
> >  	/* Set a sane SCTLR_EL1, the VHE way */
> >  	msr_s	SYS_SCTLR_EL12, x1
> > +	init_sctlr2_elx	12, x2
> >  	mov	x2, #BOOT_CPU_FLAG_E2H
> >  	b	3f
> >
> >  2:
> >  	msr	sctlr_el1, x1
> > +	init_sctlr2_elx	1, x2
> >  	mov	x2, xzr
> > +
> >  3:
> >  	mov	x0, #INIT_PSTATE_EL1
> >  	msr	spsr_el2, x0
>
> This is missing something: you should resynchronise SCTLR2_EL2 from
> SCTLR2_EL1 in __finalise_el2, rather than relying on whatever you've
> set in __init_el2_sctlr2.

Thanks. I'll add missing on enter_vhe().

--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-11 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-11 16:33 [PATCH v2 0/6] initialize SCTRL2_ELx Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-11 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] arm64: make SCTLR2_EL1 accessible Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-11 17:46   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-08-12  6:50     ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-11 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] arm64: initialise SCTLR2_ELx register at boot time Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-11 18:26   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-08-11 19:23     ` Yeoreum Yun [this message]
2025-08-11 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] arm64: save/restore SCTLR2_EL1 when cpu_suspend()/resume() Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-11 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: init SCTLR2_EL1 at cpu_soft_restart() Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-11 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: make the per-task SCTLR2_EL1 Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-11 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: arm64: initialise SCTLR2_EL1 at __kvm_host_psci_cpu_entry() Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-11 17:51   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-08-11 19:43     ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-12 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2025-08-12 10:29         ` Yeoreum Yun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aJpDQ71/f9zdwXbf@e129823.arm.com \
    --to=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=ahmed.genidi@arm.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=pavel@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.