From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f181.google.com (mail-pl1-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AD68311C0D for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 20:01:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.181 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754942501; cv=none; b=AcQTc+Umo1CX1ipPZCZWYdjMBQgf1nKD7GU7ouaBPy69VP5tcy6c5KhcXheS/d1QEkg1tMIHjjH88IHLBY0sOhry7uC74M6U3omlpNQJ8OZpEVI2tQ4EA9OUwado/+Xpa03NchLamkSTNJ1iRAIjC5UI8h6bjLfuOzqGY8ifDH0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754942501; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jOX/yi6Sr7HDRcgpvbqyoAghNh0K1oDzjkbmmkbvKD8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ttjU2DPpB3Tzt7w40xmVSQA47azh128smyZRk8iV7wCYAY+eDENB6HgqJB8wzb2e/Ku7wZxvElSQgMCBkj/XZzveCrSAUB2rsxj6KampCM3Rz26yUrkxZnQ7P8x8CsumSVSgwy4JlJFQYFl5UpsKyzr8XRrKcrDWPFLU8lmfjyg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=yuNQ41UY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.181 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="yuNQ41UY" Received: by mail-pl1-f181.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-242d1e947feso52025ad.0 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 13:01:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1754942499; x=1755547299; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Uxu6bAv2s8t/rSMFonYcPqI4bnsiyjgAqz2CcsGMxA4=; b=yuNQ41UYJZ0D6vLEbIR+F79840UwLPDbJqWnKpXS0LVclZ5xprRc590TJm8EBBAVYP P0Ibebn74eskIImcCpT28kbLsn/C4er2plysCtNG9OFjrfLrH6u06loNFgKpQkhkWVKs CtRK0DOS/Hz2uMSbNaIQObbhIyJy3Q590UOAFBu2g7iIScQ2gQNTlNlwt8ttMBveTCWZ nuqXpmVSAju5KNVlzvciIlsKiMH8C4P+RhrhSvZckZAt3ZkkUiTOS11/IjubTY+VLLwO SrknSdy+2Pi3kPp0P962Bdvy+/67aOVio5EHHKJDoMY+Mq89YA6o4/jN+V8tBZ7Ehslc iYXg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1754942499; x=1755547299; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Uxu6bAv2s8t/rSMFonYcPqI4bnsiyjgAqz2CcsGMxA4=; b=XyWB7K8JACh7CZiPywgTCqDB3YAtv6NNRwfH/aIpY75zl7DKMHpbjDr/GrxXmXuL3F 9PSs/OBmvvR+tT96beG67IMf7ZdfAN2u4BOa4nlF8ISrd8EyIX0dOvcopB6swcUlwWNa icSoGIEvgexAVQjQ+3p+6buqCmTgtFM66I9qmtT9KyvIhkRH7gDSBA2gnC4GeQ9y2WiG 6PlxoJeZQfoyCJQUXgFyfQbG1OqTPtrIQS86RLBNAE7bIDsM4pLIr/ms9qajudSJCggV HtqVte7fZ+8xaHeL6sIA7kfGZciEYXfgj8pmif9FEEroxStaWkkKTwlzUa+qpapzs1xg Ytow== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXF7SEy37GjJTT3ot8BqsNjojafEuAF0fzYVB/zrMCi0gHlp9ZgxyGtjiKroZHJZKZPdl/VPYXsTA==@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw1Vr8RkkOsERHxli13Sx9P8gIgJHw+ZWymKf0RmzxOATuMrJpa HUJxqbiQrgLBLE73v5G+kRvO5RG+l50rIiVKpBxR6dCOvhQmqaLqPraGt4flX2J/AA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctxlzZw9KIYrWbppU8Om3AcU8gPHZbfNSgL6aEIFq+73SH8stfx+sCYMOgXP+g Uto/tcDj/NDHIqJHDJA1SCIY1jKVfBKT98EnFca+ZjmmUuxb/bCKpVCTeyTKTSG232h3INhliaA OZ28/W9MkGFiKmSSnJiX02tBPZIMbwI/hmPy7LuV3iqf/uTCY4T6AOqzGUIikXAa2cDze5/vzHs 8guTZKBE7y7fwzsWaxIJvYKAJfv8GLyUDtV/iRjOK2pLXI7wGJ8u7rR8y/QC7E3BopJZkkLE8AP dAvdwm4KdcW7Lh3LW/BI+0muawZJETswIap7vip2qfVEI6Ex7GTjIHF+s95c3Jv3iwS7aUxzgf4 GQemSq59/dv2HlDJofqA9DVPOF//KLj/k/u9XNC89LQ//a4MXesAw1I2cvefXFg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHWVG7hRlBUUjOqMUzLmXjVMwuf4DXMXom2zlwHcibkKbddyA0lvszzB+bNunnpUz4zMDVEPQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:234d:b0:23d:eb0f:f49 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-242fd374f19mr683595ad.14.1754942499222; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 13:01:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (167.212.233.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.233.212.167]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-76bcce8f911sm27711067b3a.47.2025.08.11.13.01.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Aug 2025 13:01:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 20:01:34 +0000 From: Prashant Malani To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Viresh Kumar , Beata Michalska , Jie Zhan , Ionela Voinescu , Ben Segall , Dietmar Eggemann , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , open list , "open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK" , Mel Gorman , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Valentin Schneider , Vincent Guittot , z00813676 , sudeep.holla@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: CPPC: Dont read counters for idle CPUs Message-ID: References: <20250731111324.vv6vsh35enk3gg4h@vireshk-i7> <20250801044340.6ycskhhkzenkzt7a@vireshk-i7> <20250811060551.ylc6uutni4x6jqtg@vireshk-i7> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Aug 11 21:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 8:43 PM Prashant Malani wrote: > > > > On Aug 11 11:35, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > On 06-08-25, 17:19, Prashant Malani wrote: > > > > So, do we have consensus that the idle check is acceptable as proposed? > > > > (Just want to make sure this thread doesn't get lost given another thread > > > > has forked off in this conversation). > > > > > > I don't have any objections to this or a better solution to this. > > > > Thanks Viresh! Beata, can we kindly move ahead with the idle > > optimization (which is this series), while we continue discussions for > > the "under load" scenarios on the other thread? > > I need some more time, please? > > This problem is similar (if not analogous) to what happens on x86 and > that is not handled in the cpuidle core. My apologies! Didn't mean to rush. Will stand by for updates. BR, -Prashant