All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@gmail.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	lkp@intel.com, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 bpf-next 08/11] bpf, x86: add support for indirect jumps
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 08:22:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKLiwL5awqPcngf8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202508180805.aUCPtTuQ-lkp@intel.com>

On 25/08/18 10:57AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hi Anton,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
> 
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anton-Protopopov/bpf-fix-the-return-value-of-push_stack/20250817-020411
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250816180631.952085-9-a.s.protopopov%40gmail.com
> patch subject: [PATCH v1 bpf-next 08/11] bpf, x86: add support for indirect jumps
> config: x86_64-randconfig-161-20250818 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250818/202508180805.aUCPtTuQ-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14+deb12u1) 12.2.0
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202508180805.aUCPtTuQ-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> smatch warnings:
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c:25013 compute_scc() warn: unsigned 'succ_cnt' is never less than zero.
> 
> vim +/w +25013 kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>  24891  static int compute_scc(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
>  24892  {
>  24893          const u32 NOT_ON_STACK = U32_MAX;
>  24894  
>  24895          struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux = env->insn_aux_data;
>  24896          const u32 insn_cnt = env->prog->len;
>  24897          int stack_sz, dfs_sz, err = 0;
>  24898          u32 *stack, *pre, *low, *dfs;
>  24899          u32 succ_cnt, i, j, t, w;
>                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
>  24900          u32 next_preorder_num;
>  24901          u32 next_scc_id;
>  24902          bool assign_scc;
>  24903  
>  24904          next_preorder_num = 1;
>  24905          next_scc_id = 1;
>  24906          /*
> 
> [ snip ]
> 
>  25008                                  next_preorder_num++;
>  25009                                  stack[stack_sz++] = w;
>  25010                          }
>  25011                          /* Visit 'w' successors */
>  25012                          succ_cnt = insn_successors(env, env->prog, w, &succ);
>  25013                          if (succ_cnt < 0) {
>                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> unsigned can't be negative.

Thanks! Fixed, will squash into v2.

>  25014                                  err = succ_cnt;
>  25015                                  goto exit;
>  25016  
>  25017                          }
>  25018                          for (j = 0; j < succ_cnt; ++j) {
>  25019                                  if (pre[succ[j]]) {
>  25020                                          low[w] = min(low[w], low[succ[j]]);
> 
> -- 
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-18  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-16 18:06 [PATCH v1 bpf-next 00/11] BPF indirect jumps Anton Protopopov
2025-08-16 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 01/11] bpf: fix the return value of push_stack Anton Protopopov
2025-08-25 18:12   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-08-26 15:00     ` Anton Protopopov
2025-08-16 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 02/11] bpf: save the start of functions in bpf_prog_aux Anton Protopopov
2025-08-16 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 03/11] bpf, x86: add new map type: instructions array Anton Protopopov
2025-08-25 21:05   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-08-26 15:52     ` Anton Protopopov
2025-08-26 16:04       ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-08-16 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 04/11] selftests/bpf: add selftests for new insn_array map Anton Protopopov
2025-08-16 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 05/11] bpf: support instructions arrays with constants blinding Anton Protopopov
2025-08-17  5:50   ` kernel test robot
2025-08-18  8:24     ` Anton Protopopov
2025-08-25 23:29   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-08-27  9:20     ` Anton Protopopov
2025-08-16 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 06/11] selftests/bpf: test instructions arrays with blinding Anton Protopopov
2025-08-16 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 07/11] bpf, x86: allow indirect jumps to r8...r15 Anton Protopopov
2025-08-16 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 08/11] bpf, x86: add support for indirect jumps Anton Protopopov
2025-08-18  0:35   ` kernel test robot
2025-08-18  7:57     ` Dan Carpenter
2025-08-18  8:22     ` Anton Protopopov [this message]
2025-08-25 23:15   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-08-27 15:34     ` Anton Protopopov
2025-08-27 18:58       ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-08-28  9:58     ` Anton Protopopov
2025-08-28 14:15       ` Anton Protopopov
2025-08-28 16:10         ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-08-28 16:30       ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-08-16 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 09/11] bpf: disasm: add support for BPF_JMP|BPF_JA|BPF_X Anton Protopopov
2025-08-16 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 10/11] libbpf: support llvm-generated indirect jumps Anton Protopopov
2025-08-21  0:20   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-08-21 13:05     ` Anton Protopopov
2025-08-21 18:14       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-08-21 19:12         ` Anton Protopopov
2025-09-13 19:38     ` Anton Protopopov
2025-08-26  0:06   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-08-26 16:15     ` Anton Protopopov
2025-08-26 16:51       ` Anton Protopopov
2025-08-26 16:47         ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-08-16 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 11/11] selftests/bpf: add selftests for " Anton Protopopov
2025-09-04 20:27 ` [PATCH v1 bpf-next 00/11] BPF " Yonghong Song
2025-09-05  8:20   ` Anton Protopopov
2025-09-05 15:39     ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aKLiwL5awqPcngf8@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=a.s.protopopov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=aspsk@isovalent.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=qmo@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.