From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@amd.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, santosh.shukla@amd.com, bp@alien8.de,
isaku.yamahata@intel.com, vaishali.thakkar@suse.com,
kai.huang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] KVM: SVM: Enable Secure TSC for SNP guests
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 11:31:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKTDBMCPxOXQhzDq@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250804103751.7760-3-nikunj@amd.com>
On Mon, Aug 04, 2025, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> Add support for Secure TSC, allowing userspace to configure the Secure TSC
> feature for SNP guests. Use the SNP specification's desired TSC frequency
> parameter during the SNP_LAUNCH_START command to set the mean TSC
> frequency in KHz for Secure TSC enabled guests.
>
> Always use kvm->arch.arch.default_tsc_khz as the TSC frequency that is
> passed to SNP guests in the SNP_LAUNCH_START command. The default value
> is the host TSC frequency. The userspace can optionally change the TSC
> frequency via the KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ ioctl before calling the
> SNP_LAUNCH_START ioctl.
>
> Introduce the read-only MSR GUEST_TSC_FREQ (0xc0010134) that returns
> guest's effective frequency in MHZ when Secure TSC is enabled for SNP
> guests. Disable interception of this MSR when Secure TSC is enabled. Note
> that GUEST_TSC_FREQ MSR is accessible only to the guest and not from the
> hypervisor context.
>
> Co-developed-by: Ketan Chaturvedi <Ketan.Chaturvedi@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ketan Chaturvedi <Ketan.Chaturvedi@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
> index ffc27f676243..17f6c3fedeee 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ static_assert((X2AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID & AVIC_PHYSICAL_MAX_INDEX_MASK) == X2AVIC_
> #define SVM_SEV_FEAT_RESTRICTED_INJECTION BIT(3)
> #define SVM_SEV_FEAT_ALTERNATE_INJECTION BIT(4)
> #define SVM_SEV_FEAT_DEBUG_SWAP BIT(5)
> +#define SVM_SEV_FEAT_SECURE_TSC BIT(9)
>
> #define VMCB_ALLOWED_SEV_FEATURES_VALID BIT_ULL(63)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index e88dce598785..f9ab9ecc213f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,14 @@ static bool sev_vcpu_has_debug_swap(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> return sev->vmsa_features & SVM_SEV_FEAT_DEBUG_SWAP;
> }
>
> +bool snp_secure_tsc_enabled(struct kvm *kvm)
snp_is_secure_tsc_enabled() to make it super obvious this is a predicate.
> +{
> + struct kvm_sev_info *sev = to_kvm_sev_info(kvm);
> +
> + return (sev->vmsa_features & SVM_SEV_FEAT_SECURE_TSC) &&
> + !WARN_ON_ONCE(!sev_snp_guest(kvm));
Align indentation.
> +}
> @@ -4455,6 +4479,9 @@ void sev_es_recalc_msr_intercepts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> !guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP) &&
> !guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDPID));
>
> + if (snp_secure_tsc_enabled(vcpu->kvm))
> + svm_disable_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_AMD64_GUEST_TSC_FREQ, MSR_TYPE_R);
I'm leaning towards:
svm_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_AMD64_GUEST_TSC_FREQ, MSR_TYPE_R,
!snp_is_secure_tsc_enabled(vcpu->kvm));
because the cost of setting a bit is negligible.
> +
> /*
> * For SEV-ES, accesses to MSR_IA32_XSS should not be intercepted if
> * the host/guest supports its use.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index d9931c6c4bc6..a81bf83ccb52 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -1317,6 +1317,8 @@ static int svm_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> svm->guest_state_loaded = false;
>
> + vcpu->arch.guest_tsc_protected = snp_secure_tsc_enabled(vcpu->kvm);
Hmm, we can and should handle this in sev.c. If we add sev_vcpu_create(), then
we don't need to expose snp_is_secure_tsc_enabled(), and we can move more code
into that helper.
I'll post a combined series of this and the GHCB version patches.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-19 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-04 10:37 [PATCH v10 0/2] Enable Secure TSC for SEV-SNP Nikunj A Dadhania
2025-08-04 10:37 ` [PATCH v10 1/2] x86/cpufeatures: Add SNP Secure TSC Nikunj A Dadhania
2025-08-04 10:37 ` [PATCH v10 2/2] KVM: SVM: Enable Secure TSC for SNP guests Nikunj A Dadhania
2025-08-19 18:31 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-08-20 5:31 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2025-08-19 3:47 ` [PATCH v10 0/2] Enable Secure TSC for SEV-SNP Nikunj A. Dadhania
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aKTDBMCPxOXQhzDq@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=vaishali.thakkar@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.