From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Tanish Desai <tanishdesai37@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Mads Ynddal <mads@ynddal.dk>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tracetool: add CHECK_TRACE_EVENT_GET_STATE
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 13:14:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKW8NABFH8g-NCkx@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46c5fbcb-9aec-4f9e-984a-b2f255210007@redhat.com>
On Thu, Aug 07, 2025 at 12:35:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 8/6/25 21:13, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > It is best to have new functionality added in a separate commit
> > from the removal of obsolete code.
>
> My mistake - when Tanish and I "un-rebased" these patches from on top of
> yours, we placed the removal of the "nocheck" functions in patch 1 instead
> of patch 2 where it made more sense.
>
> > I've co-incidentally got removal of this obsolete code in the
> > tracing test suite series I posted, so one will need to be
> > rebased on top of the other, depending on what order Stefan
> > wants to take the patches.
>
> If the main blocker (the /dev/stdout issue) is fixed quickly, your patches
> should go in first because they aid in reviewing this one.
I posted a new version that drops the stdout patch
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2025-08/msg02716.html
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-20 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-06 15:05 [PATCH v2 0/2] tracetool: remove no_check_foo() and if(true){..} blocks Tanish Desai
2025-08-06 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] tracetool: add CHECK_TRACE_EVENT_GET_STATE Tanish Desai
2025-08-06 19:13 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-08-07 10:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-08-20 12:14 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2025-08-07 19:23 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-08-06 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] tracetool/format: remove redundent trace-event checks Tanish Desai
2025-08-06 16:53 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-08-07 19:25 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aKW8NABFH8g-NCkx@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=mads@ynddal.dk \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=tanishdesai37@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.