All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Sairaj Kodilkar <sarunkod@amd.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>,
	Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] x86/cpu/topology: Work around the nuances of virtualization on AMD/Hygon
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 15:29:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKWcaPyal4mDfy3J@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97aace4c-921f-4037-b8f2-c4112b4a26a9@amd.com>

On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 02:42:26PM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Hello Boris,
> 
> On 8/20/2025 2:29 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 01:41:28PM +0530, Naveen N Rao wrote:
> >> That suggests use of leaf 0xb for the initial x2APIC ID especially 
> >> during early init.  I'm not sure why leaf 0x8000001e was preferred over 
> >> leaf 0xb in commit c749ce393b8f ("x86/cpu: Use common topology code for 
> >> AMD") though.
> > 
> > Well, I see parse_topology_amd() calling cpu_parse_topology_ext() if you have
> > TOPOEXT - which all AMD hw does - which then does cpu_parse_topology_ext() and
> > that one tries 0x80000026 and then falls back to 0xb and *only* *then* to
> > 0x8000001e.
> > 
> > So, it looks like it DTRT to me...
> 
> But parse_8000_001e() then unconditionally overwrites the
> "initial_apicid" with the value in 0x8000001E EAX despite it being
> populated from cpu_parse_topology_ext().
> 
> The flow is as follows:
> 
>   parse_topology_amd()
>     if (X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT) /* True */
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>	cpu_parse_topology_ext();

Patch 2 from this patchset, which removes this "if" condition above
seems to be the right thing to do.

X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT refers to CPUID 0x80000001.ECX[22] which advertises the support for 0x8000001D.EAX
and 0x8000001E.EAX.

OTOH, the function cpu_parse_topology_ext() parses the topology via the following CPUIDs in that order

* CPUID 0x1f (Intel Only)
* CPUID 0x80000026 (AMD only)
* CPUID 0xB (Both Intel and AMD)

None of these have anything to do with X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT.

So the call to cpu_parse_topology_ext() in parse_topology_amd()
doesn't have to be gated by the presence or absence of
X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT.

I agree that QEMU needs to sort out what needs to do something better
than clearing all the regs of CPUID 0x8000001E on encountering a
topology with more than 256 cores.

Or at the very least not clear the CPUID 0x8000001E.EAX which has the
provision to advertise a valid Extended APIC ID.

-- 
Thanks and Regards
gautham.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-20  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-18  6:04 [PATCH v3 0/4] x86/cpu/topology: Work around the nuances of virtualization on AMD/Hygon K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-18  6:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/msr-index: Define AMD64_CPUID_FN_EXT MSR K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-18  6:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] x86/cpu/topology: Use initial APICID from XTOPOEXT on AMD/HYGON K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-18  6:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/cpu/topology: Always try cpu_parse_topology_ext() on AMD/Hygon K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-18  6:04 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] x86/cpu/topology: Check for X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY instead of passing has_topoext K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-24 13:38   ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-24 14:55     ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-25  4:05       ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-19 11:34 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] x86/cpu/topology: Work around the nuances of virtualization on AMD/Hygon Borislav Petkov
2025-08-19 14:28   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-19 21:24     ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-20  8:11   ` Naveen N Rao
2025-08-20  8:59     ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-20  9:12       ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-20  9:28         ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-20  9:59         ` Gautham R. Shenoy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aKWcaPyal4mDfy3J@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com \
    --to=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sarunkod@amd.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin@zytor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.