On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 12:35:46PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Removing the complete __fixups__ and __local_fixups__ tree might delete
> data that should better be retained. See the added test for a situation
> that was broken before.
> 
> Note that without removing /__fixups__ and /__local_fixups__ in
> generate_fixups_tree() and generate_local_fixups_tree() respectively
> calling build_and_name_child_node() isn't safe as the nodes might
> already exist and then a duplicate would be added. So build_root_node()
> has to be used which copes correctly here.
> 
> Fixes: 915daadbb62d ("Start with empty __local_fixups__ and __fixups__ nodes")
> Closes: https://github.com/dgibson/dtc/issues/170
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>

Merged. thanks.

Note that I generally prefer negative values for error codes (-1
instead of 1).  I altered that on merge.

-- 
David Gibson (he or they)	| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you, not the other way
				| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson