From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: "Théo Lebrun" <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@xilinx.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@mobileye.com>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 5/5] net: macb: avoid double endianness swap in macb_set_hwaddr()
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 16:25:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKXo_jihNKyJmxVQ@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250820-macb-fixes-v4-5-23c399429164@bootlin.com>
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 04:55:09PM +0200, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> writel() does a CPU->LE conversion. Drop manual cpu_to_le*() calls.
>
> On little-endian system:
> - cpu_to_le32() is a no-op (LE->LE),
> - writel() is a no-op (LE->LE),
> - dev_addr will therefore not be swapped and written as-is.
>
> On big-endian system:
> - cpu_to_le32() is a swap (BE->LE),
> - writel() is a swap (BE->LE),
> - dev_addr will therefore be swapped twice and written as a BE value.
I'm not convinced by this, I think you're missing something.
writel() on a BE or LE system will give you bits 7:0 of the CPU value
written to LE bit 7:0 of the register. It has to be this way, otherwise
we would need to do endian conversions everwhere where we write simple
numbers to device registers.
Why?
Remember that on a LE system with a 32-bit bus, a hex value of
0x76543210 at the CPU when written without conversion will appear
as:
0 on bus bits 0:3
1 on bus bits 4:7
...
6 on bus bits 24:27
7 on bus bits 28:31
whereas on a BE system, this is reversed:
6 on bus bits 0:3
7 on bus bits 4:7
...
0 on bus bits 24:27
1 on bus bits 28:31
The specification is that writel() will write in LE format even on
BE systems, so there is a need to do an endian conversion for BE
systems.
So, if a device expects bits 0:7 on the bus to be the first byte of
the MAC address (high byte of the OUI) then this must be in CPU
bits 0:7 as well.
Now, assuming that a MAC address of AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF gets read as
0xDDCCBBAA by the first read on a LE machine, it will get read as
0xAABBCCDD on a BE machine.
We can now see that combining these two, getting rid of the
cpu_to_le32() is likely wrong.
Therefore, I am not convinced this patch is actually correct.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-20 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-20 14:55 [PATCH net v4 0/5] net: macb: various fixes Théo Lebrun
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH net v4 1/5] dt-bindings: net: cdns,macb: allow tsu_clk without tx_clk Théo Lebrun
2025-08-26 9:25 ` Nicolas Ferre
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH net v4 2/5] net: macb: remove illusion about TBQPH/RBQPH being per-queue Théo Lebrun
2025-08-26 9:27 ` Nicolas Ferre
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH net v4 3/5] net: macb: move ring size computation to functions Théo Lebrun
2025-08-26 9:30 ` Nicolas Ferre
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH net v4 4/5] net: macb: single dma_alloc_coherent() for DMA descriptors Théo Lebrun
2025-08-26 15:23 ` Nicolas Ferre
2025-09-10 16:22 ` Théo Lebrun
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH net v4 5/5] net: macb: avoid double endianness swap in macb_set_hwaddr() Théo Lebrun
2025-08-20 15:25 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2025-09-05 9:02 ` Théo Lebrun
2025-08-20 15:03 ` [PATCH net v4 0/5] net: macb: various fixes Théo Lebrun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aKXo_jihNKyJmxVQ@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=harini.katakam@xilinx.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
--cc=tawfik.bayouk@mobileye.com \
--cc=theo.lebrun@bootlin.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.