From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bala-Vignesh-Reddy <reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, mic@digikod.net,
gnoack@google.com, david@redhat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org,
surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: centralise maybe-unused definition in kselftest.h
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 09:21:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKfGFB2MmkbA4BBC@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250821101159.2238-1-reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 03:41:59PM +0530, Bala-Vignesh-Reddy wrote:
> Several selftests subdirectories duplicated the define __maybe_unused,
> leading to redundant code. Moved to kselftest.h header and removed
> other definition.
>
> This addresses the duplication noted in the proc-pid-vm warning fix
>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Link:https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250820143954.33d95635e504e94df01930d0@linux-foundation.org/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bala-Vignesh-Reddy <reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-22 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-21 10:11 [PATCH] selftests: centralise maybe-unused definition in kselftest.h Bala-Vignesh-Reddy
2025-08-21 14:46 ` Wei Yang
2025-08-21 16:56 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-22 1:21 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-08-22 14:51 ` Mickaël Salaün
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aKfGFB2MmkbA4BBC@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.