From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dave@treblig.org>,
"Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Fabiano Rosas" <farosas@suse.de>,
"Hailiang Zhang" <zhanghailiang@xfusion.com>,
"Yury Kotov" <yury-kotov@yandex-team.ru>,
"Prasad Pandit" <ppandit@redhat.com>,
"Zhang Chen" <zhangckid@gmail.com>,
"Li Zhijian" <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>,
"Juraj Marcin" <jmarcin@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/9] migration: Thread-ify precopy vmstate load process
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 13:17:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLHgmt7vDbmWCS24@x1.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a7f72cc7-d5ec-4a9e-a1a1-d77f376c5ce4@yandex-team.ru>
On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 11:29:59AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> > For that, qemu_loadvm_state() and qemu_loadvm_state_main() functions need
> > to now take a "bql_held" parameter saying whether bql is held. We could
> > use things like BQL_LOCK_GUARD(), but this patch goes with explicit
> > lockings rather than relying on bql_locked TLS variable. In case of
> > migration, we always know whether BQL is held in different context as long
> > as we can still pass that information downwards.
>
> Agree, but I think it's better to make new macros following same pattern, i.e.
>
> WITH_BQL_HELD(bql_held) {
> action();
> }
>
> instead of
>
> WITH_BQL_HELD(bql_held, actions());
>
> ..
>
> Or I'm missing something and we already have a precedent of the latter
> notation?
Nop.. it's just that when initially working on that I didn't try as hard to
achieve such pattern. Here we need to recover the BQL status after the
block, so I didn't immediately see how autoptr would work there.
But I tried slightly harder, I think below should achieve the same pattern
but based on some for() magic.
Thanks for raising this, early comments still be welcomed or I'll go with
that.
===8<===
static inline void
with_bql_held_lock(bool bql_held, const char *file, int line)
{
assert(bql_held == bql_locked());
if (!bql_held) {
bql_lock_impl(file, line);
}
}
static inline void
with_bql_held_unlock(bool bql_held)
{
assert(bql_locked());
if (!bql_held) {
bql_unlock();
}
}
/**
* WITH_BQL_HELD(): Run a block of code, making sure BQL is held
* @bql_held: Whether BQL is already held
*
* Example use case:
*
* WITH_BQL_HELD(bql_held) {
* // BQL is guaranteed to be held within this block,
* // if it wasn't held, will be released when the block finishes.
* }
*/
#define WITH_BQL_HELD(bql_held) \
for (bool _bql_once = \
(with_bql_held_lock(bql_held, __FILE__, __LINE__), true); \
_bql_once; \
_bql_once = (with_bql_held_unlock(bql_held), false)) \
static inline void
with_bql_released_unlock(bool bql_held)
{
assert(bql_held == bql_locked());
if (bql_held) {
bql_unlock();
}
}
static inline void
with_bql_released_lock(bool bql_held, const char *file, int line)
{
assert(!bql_locked());
if (bql_held) {
bql_lock_impl(file, line);
}
}
/**
* WITH_BQL_RELEASED(): Run a task, making sure BQL is released
* @bql_held: Whether BQL is already held
*
* Example use case:
*
* WITH_BQL_RELEASED(bql_held) {
* // BQL is guaranteed to be released within this block,
* // if it was held, will be re-taken when the block finishes.
* }
*/
#define WITH_BQL_RELEASED(bql_held) \
for (bool _bql_once = (with_bql_released_unlock(bql_held), true); \
_bql_once; \
_bql_once = \
(with_bql_released_lock(bql_held, __FILE__, __LINE__), false)) \
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-30 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-27 20:59 [PATCH RFC 0/9] migration: Threadify loadvm process Peter Xu
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 1/9] migration/vfio: Remove BQL implication in vfio_multifd_switchover_start() Peter Xu
2025-08-28 18:05 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2025-10-21 20:36 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-16 21:34 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 2/9] migration/rdma: Fix wrong context in qio_channel_rdma_shutdown() Peter Xu
2025-09-16 21:41 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-09-26 1:01 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 3/9] migration/rdma: Allow qemu_rdma_wait_comp_channel work with thread Peter Xu
2025-09-16 21:50 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-09-26 1:02 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 4/9] migration/rdma: Change io_create_watch() to return immediately Peter Xu
2025-09-16 22:35 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-08 20:34 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-26 2:39 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-10-08 20:42 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 5/9] migration: Thread-ify precopy vmstate load process Peter Xu
2025-08-27 23:51 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2025-08-29 16:37 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-04 1:38 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2025-10-08 21:02 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-29 8:29 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2025-08-29 17:17 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2025-09-01 9:35 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2025-10-21 18:49 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-17 18:23 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-09 21:41 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-26 3:41 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-10-08 21:10 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 6/9] migration/rdma: Remove coroutine path in qemu_rdma_wait_comp_channel Peter Xu
2025-09-16 22:39 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-08 21:18 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-26 2:44 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 7/9] migration/postcopy: Remove workaround on wait preempt channel Peter Xu
2025-09-17 18:30 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 8/9] migration/ram: Remove workaround on ram yield during load Peter Xu
2025-09-17 18:31 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 9/9] migration/rdma: Remove rdma_cm_poll_handler Peter Xu
2025-09-17 18:38 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-08 21:22 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-26 3:38 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-08-29 8:29 ` [PATCH RFC 0/9] migration: Threadify loadvm process Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2025-08-29 17:18 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-04 8:27 ` Zhang Chen
2025-10-08 21:26 ` Peter Xu
2025-10-20 21:41 ` Peter Xu
2025-10-20 22:08 ` Lukas Straub
2025-10-21 2:31 ` Zhang Chen
2025-10-21 13:58 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-16 21:32 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-09 16:58 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aLHgmt7vDbmWCS24@x1.local \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dave@treblig.org \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=jmarcin@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lizhijian@fujitsu.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=yury-kotov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=zhangckid@gmail.com \
--cc=zhanghailiang@xfusion.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.