All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Zecheng Li <zecheng@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Xu Liu <xliuprof@google.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] perf annotate: Track arithmetic instructions on pointers
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 00:13:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLKknf6qFxVgN3gJ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250825195737.225824-1-zecheng@google.com>

On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 07:57:37PM +0000, Zecheng Li wrote:
> Track the arithmetic operations on registers with pointer types. We
> handle only add, sub and lea instructions. The original pointer
> information needs to be preserved for getting outermost struct types.
> For example, reg0 points to a struct cfs_rq, when we add 0x10 to reg0,
> it should preserve the information of struct cfs_rq + 0x10 in the
> register instead of a pointer type to the child field at 0x10.
> 
> Details:
> 
> 1.  struct type_state_reg now includes an offset, indicating if the
>     register points to the start or an internal part of its associated
>     type. This offset is used in mem to reg and reg to stack mem
>     transfers, and also applied to the final type offset.
> 
> 2.  lea offset(%sp/%fp), reg is now treated as taking the address of a
>     stack variable. It worked fine in most cases, but an issue with this
>     approach is the pointer type may not exist.
> 
> 3.  lea offset(%base), reg is handled by moving the type from %base and
>     adding an offset, similar to an add operation followed by a mov reg
>     to reg.
> 
> 4.  Non-stack variables from DWARF with non-zero offsets in their
>     location expressions are now accepted with register offset tracking.
> 
> Limitation: Offset tracking for register moved to the stack is not yet
> implemented. Currently, moving an register with offset to the stack
> resolves to the member type, which worked in some of the cases. Strictly
> it should be a pointer to the immediate child member. Multi-register
> addressing modes in LEA are not supported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zecheng Li <zecheng@google.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/arch/x86/annotate/instructions.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c             |  14 +-
>  tools/perf/util/annotate-data.h             |   6 +
>  3 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/annotate/instructions.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/annotate/instructions.c
> index c6d403eae744..540b4d0a01af 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/annotate/instructions.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/annotate/instructions.c
> @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  			tsr = &state->regs[state->ret_reg];
>  			tsr->type = type_die;
>  			tsr->kind = TSR_KIND_TYPE;
> +			tsr->offset = 0;
>  			tsr->ok = true;
>  
>  			pr_debug_dtp("call [%x] return -> reg%d",
> @@ -284,6 +285,7 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  			    !strcmp(var_name, "this_cpu_off") &&
>  			    tsr->kind == TSR_KIND_CONST) {
>  				tsr->kind = TSR_KIND_PERCPU_BASE;
> +				tsr->offset = 0;
>  				tsr->ok = true;
>  				imm_value = tsr->imm_value;
>  			}
> @@ -291,6 +293,15 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  		else
>  			return;
>  
> +		/* Ignore add to non-pointer types like int */
> +		if (dwarf_tag(&tsr->type) == DW_TAG_pointer_type &&
> +		    src->reg1 != DWARF_REG_PC && tsr->kind == TSR_KIND_TYPE && !dst->mem_ref) {
> +			tsr->offset += imm_value;
> +			pr_debug_dtp("add [%x] offset %#"PRIx64" to reg%d",
> +				     insn_offset, imm_value, dst->reg1);
> +			pr_debug_type_name(&tsr->type, tsr->kind);
> +		}
> +
>  		if (tsr->kind != TSR_KIND_PERCPU_BASE)
>  			return;
>  
> @@ -302,6 +313,7 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  			 */
>  			tsr->type = type_die;
>  			tsr->kind = TSR_KIND_POINTER;
> +			tsr->offset = 0;
>  			tsr->ok = true;
>  
>  			pr_debug_dtp("add [%x] percpu %#"PRIx64" -> reg%d",
> @@ -311,6 +323,96 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!strncmp(dl->ins.name, "sub", 3)) {
> +		u64 imm_value = -1ULL;
> +
> +		if (!has_reg_type(state, dst->reg1))
> +			return;
> +
> +		tsr = &state->regs[dst->reg1];
> +		tsr->copied_from = -1;
> +
> +		if (src->imm)
> +			imm_value = src->offset;
> +		else if (has_reg_type(state, src->reg1) &&
> +			 state->regs[src->reg1].kind == TSR_KIND_CONST)
> +			imm_value = state->regs[src->reg1].imm_value;
> +
> +		if (dwarf_tag(&tsr->type) == DW_TAG_pointer_type &&
> +		    src->reg1 != DWARF_REG_PC && tsr->kind == TSR_KIND_TYPE && !dst->mem_ref) {
> +			tsr->offset -= imm_value;
> +			pr_debug_dtp("sub [%x] offset %#"PRIx64" to reg%d",
> +				     insn_offset, imm_value, dst->reg1);
> +			pr_debug_type_name(&tsr->type, tsr->kind);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!strncmp(dl->ins.name, "lea", 3)) {
> +		int sreg = src->reg1;
> +		struct type_state_reg src_tsr;
> +
> +		if (!has_reg_type(state, sreg) ||
> +		    !has_reg_type(state, dst->reg1) ||
> +		    !src->mem_ref)
> +			return;
> +
> +		src_tsr = state->regs[sreg];
> +		tsr = &state->regs[dst->reg1];
> +
> +		tsr->copied_from = -1;
> +		tsr->ok = false;
> +
> +		/* Case 1: Based on stack pointer or frame pointer */
> +		if (sreg == fbreg || sreg == state->stack_reg) {
> +			struct type_state_stack *stack;
> +			int offset = src->offset - fboff;
> +
> +			stack = find_stack_state(state, offset);
> +			if (!stack)
> +				return;
> +
> +			/* Now the register becomes a pointer to the stack variable */
> +			if (!die_find_pointer_to_type(cu_die, &stack->type, &type_die))
> +				return;
> +
> +			tsr->type = type_die;
> +			tsr->kind = TSR_KIND_TYPE;

I was thinking we can use TSR_KIND_POINTER here.  Probably we need to
distinguish it from the existing percpu base use case. Maybe you want
to rename it.  Then you don't need to find a pointer type in the DWARF.

> +			tsr->offset = 0;

I think it can refer to a member in a struct.  How about this?

			tsr->offset = state->offset - offset;

Thanks,
Namhyung


> +			tsr->ok = true;
> +
> +			if (sreg == fbreg) {
> +				pr_debug_dtp("lea [%x] address of -%#x(stack) -> reg%d",
> +					     insn_offset, -src->offset, dst->reg1);
> +			} else {
> +				pr_debug_dtp("lea [%x] address of %#x(reg%d) -> reg%d",
> +					     insn_offset, src->offset, sreg, dst->reg1);
> +			}
> +
> +			pr_debug_type_name(&tsr->type, tsr->kind);
> +		}
> +		/* Case 2: Based on a register holding a typed pointer */
> +		else if (src_tsr.ok && src_tsr.kind == TSR_KIND_TYPE) {
> +
> +			/* Check if the target type has a member at the new offset */
> +			if (__die_get_real_type(&state->regs[sreg].type, &type_die) == NULL ||
> +			    die_get_member_type(&type_die,
> +					src->offset + src_tsr.offset, &type_die) == NULL)
> +				return;
> +
> +			tsr->type = src_tsr.type;
> +			tsr->kind = TSR_KIND_TYPE;
> +			tsr->offset = src->offset + src_tsr.offset;
> +			tsr->ok = true;
> +
> +			pr_debug_dtp("lea [%x] address of %s%#x(reg%d) -> reg%d",
> +						insn_offset, src->offset < 0 ? "-" : "",
> +						abs(src->offset), sreg, dst->reg1);
> +
> +			pr_debug_type_name(&tsr->type, tsr->kind);
> +		}
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (strncmp(dl->ins.name, "mov", 3))
>  		return;
>  
> @@ -345,6 +447,7 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  
>  			if (var_addr == 40) {
>  				tsr->kind = TSR_KIND_CANARY;
> +				tsr->offset = 0;
>  				tsr->ok = true;
>  
>  				pr_debug_dtp("mov [%x] stack canary -> reg%d\n",
> @@ -361,6 +464,7 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  
>  			tsr->type = type_die;
>  			tsr->kind = TSR_KIND_TYPE;
> +			tsr->offset = 0;
>  			tsr->ok = true;
>  
>  			pr_debug_dtp("mov [%x] this-cpu addr=%#"PRIx64" -> reg%d",
> @@ -372,6 +476,7 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  		if (src->imm) {
>  			tsr->kind = TSR_KIND_CONST;
>  			tsr->imm_value = src->offset;
> +			tsr->offset = 0;
>  			tsr->ok = true;
>  
>  			pr_debug_dtp("mov [%x] imm=%#x -> reg%d\n",
> @@ -388,6 +493,7 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  		tsr->type = state->regs[src->reg1].type;
>  		tsr->kind = state->regs[src->reg1].kind;
>  		tsr->imm_value = state->regs[src->reg1].imm_value;
> +		tsr->offset = 0;
>  		tsr->ok = true;
>  
>  		/* To copy back the variable type later (hopefully) */
> @@ -421,12 +527,14 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  			} else if (!stack->compound) {
>  				tsr->type = stack->type;
>  				tsr->kind = stack->kind;
> +				tsr->offset = 0;
>  				tsr->ok = true;
>  			} else if (die_get_member_type(&stack->type,
>  						       offset - stack->offset,
>  						       &type_die)) {
>  				tsr->type = type_die;
>  				tsr->kind = TSR_KIND_TYPE;
> +				tsr->offset = 0;
>  				tsr->ok = true;
>  			} else {
>  				tsr->ok = false;
> @@ -446,9 +554,10 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  		else if (has_reg_type(state, sreg) && state->regs[sreg].ok &&
>  			 state->regs[sreg].kind == TSR_KIND_TYPE &&
>  			 die_deref_ptr_type(&state->regs[sreg].type,
> -					    src->offset, &type_die)) {
> +					    src->offset + state->regs[sreg].offset, &type_die)) {
>  			tsr->type = type_die;
>  			tsr->kind = TSR_KIND_TYPE;
> +			tsr->offset = 0;
>  			tsr->ok = true;
>  
>  			pr_debug_dtp("mov [%x] %#x(reg%d) -> reg%d",
> @@ -473,6 +582,7 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  
>  			tsr->type = type_die;
>  			tsr->kind = TSR_KIND_TYPE;
> +			tsr->offset = 0;
>  			tsr->ok = true;
>  
>  			pr_debug_dtp("mov [%x] global addr=%"PRIx64" -> reg%d",
> @@ -504,6 +614,7 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  			    die_get_member_type(&type_die, offset, &type_die)) {
>  				tsr->type = type_die;
>  				tsr->kind = TSR_KIND_TYPE;
> +				tsr->offset = 0;
>  				tsr->ok = true;
>  
>  				if (src->multi_regs) {
> @@ -526,6 +637,7 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  					     src->offset, &type_die)) {
>  			tsr->type = type_die;
>  			tsr->kind = TSR_KIND_TYPE;
> +			tsr->offset = 0;
>  			tsr->ok = true;
>  
>  			pr_debug_dtp("mov [%x] pointer %#x(reg%d) -> reg%d",
> @@ -548,6 +660,7 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  							&var_name, &offset) &&
>  				    !strcmp(var_name, "__per_cpu_offset")) {
>  					tsr->kind = TSR_KIND_PERCPU_BASE;
> +					tsr->offset = 0;
>  					tsr->ok = true;
>  
>  					pr_debug_dtp("mov [%x] percpu base reg%d\n",
> @@ -571,6 +684,19 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  			int offset = dst->offset - fboff;
>  
>  			tsr = &state->regs[src->reg1];
> +			type_die = tsr->type;
> +
> +			/* The register is derived from a pointer to the type */
> +			if (tsr->offset != 0) {
> +				/*
> +				 * deref gets the innermost field, but we actually want direct
> +				 * child field and take a pointer to it.
> +				 * However array type like unsigned long[] is already a pointer
> +				 * and is the most common case for this kind of stack variable.
> +				 */
> +				if (die_deref_ptr_type(&tsr->type, tsr->offset, &type_die) == NULL)
> +					return;
> +			}
>  
>  			stack = find_stack_state(state, offset);
>  			if (stack) {
> @@ -583,10 +709,10 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  				 */
>  				if (!stack->compound)
>  					set_stack_state(stack, offset, tsr->kind,
> -							&tsr->type);
> +							&type_die);
>  			} else {
>  				findnew_stack_state(state, offset, tsr->kind,
> -						    &tsr->type);
> +						    &type_die);
>  			}
>  
>  			if (dst->reg1 == fbreg) {
> @@ -596,7 +722,11 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  				pr_debug_dtp("mov [%x] reg%d -> %#x(reg%d)",
>  					     insn_offset, src->reg1, offset, dst->reg1);
>  			}
> -			pr_debug_type_name(&tsr->type, tsr->kind);
> +			if (tsr->offset != 0)
> +				pr_debug_dtp(" reg%d offset %#x ->",
> +					src->reg1, tsr->offset);
> +
> +			pr_debug_type_name(&type_die, tsr->kind);
>  		}
>  		/*
>  		 * Ignore other transfers since it'd set a value in a struct
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
> index 258157cc43c2..e067e91f2037 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
> @@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ static void update_var_state(struct type_state *state, struct data_loc_info *dlo
>  					     insn_offset, -offset);
>  			}
>  			pr_debug_type_name(&mem_die, TSR_KIND_TYPE);
> -		} else if (has_reg_type(state, var->reg) && var->offset == 0) {
> +		} else if (has_reg_type(state, var->reg)) {
>  			struct type_state_reg *reg;
>  			Dwarf_Die orig_type;
>  
> @@ -907,13 +907,17 @@ static void update_var_state(struct type_state *state, struct data_loc_info *dlo
>  				continue;
>  
>  			orig_type = reg->type;
> -
> +			/*
> +			 * var->offset + reg value is the beginning of the struct
> +			 * reg->offset is the offset the reg points
> +			 */
> +			reg->offset = -var->offset;
>  			reg->type = mem_die;
>  			reg->kind = TSR_KIND_TYPE;
>  			reg->ok = true;
>  
> -			pr_debug_dtp("var [%"PRIx64"] reg%d",
> -				     insn_offset, var->reg);
> +			pr_debug_dtp("var [%"PRIx64"] reg%d offset %x",
> +				     insn_offset, var->reg, var->offset);
>  			pr_debug_type_name(&mem_die, TSR_KIND_TYPE);
>  
>  			/*
> @@ -1101,7 +1105,7 @@ static enum type_match_result check_matching_type(struct type_state *state,
>  		if (__die_get_real_type(&state->regs[reg].type, type_die) == NULL)
>  			return PERF_TMR_NO_POINTER;
>  
> -		dloc->type_offset = dloc->op->offset;
> +		dloc->type_offset = dloc->op->offset + state->regs[reg].offset;
>  
>  		if (dwarf_tag(type_die) == DW_TAG_typedef)
>  			die_get_real_type(type_die, &sized_type);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.h b/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.h
> index 541fee1a5f0a..47a4c752b917 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.h
> @@ -173,6 +173,12 @@ extern struct annotated_data_stat ann_data_stat;
>  struct type_state_reg {
>  	Dwarf_Die type;
>  	u32 imm_value;
> +	/*
> +	 * The offset within the struct that the register points to.
> +	 * A value of 0 means the register points to the beginning.
> +	 * type_offset = op->offset + reg->offset
> +	 */
> +	s32 offset;
>  	bool ok;
>  	bool caller_saved;
>  	u8 kind;
> -- 
> 2.51.0.261.g7ce5a0a67e-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-30  7:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-25 19:57 [PATCH v2 06/10] perf annotate: Track arithmetic instructions on pointers Zecheng Li
2025-08-30  7:13 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2025-09-03 20:26   ` Zecheng Li
2025-09-05 19:52     ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aLKknf6qFxVgN3gJ@google.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=xliuprof@google.com \
    --cc=zecheng@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.