From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, void@manifault.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, changwoo@igalia.com, hodgesd@meta.com,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, jake@hillion.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] sched_ext: Harden scx_bpf_cpu_rq()
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 13:58:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLbb9ljZvAvghZa8@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250902111143.2667154-1-christian.loehle@arm.com>
On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 12:11:40PM +0100, Christian Loehle wrote:
> scx_bpf_cpu_rq() currently allows accessing struct rq fields without
> holding the associated rq.
> It is being used by scx_cosmos, scx_flash, scx_lavd, scx_layered, and
> scx_tickless. Fortunately it is only ever used to fetch rq->curr.
> So provide an alternative scx_bpf_remote_curr() that doesn't expose struct rq
> and provide a hardened scx_bpf_cpu_rq_locked() by ensuring we hold the rq lock.
> Add a deprecation warning to scx_bpf_cpu_rq() that mentions the two alternatives.
>
> This also simplifies scx code from:
>
> rq = scx_bpf_cpu_rq(cpu);
> if (!rq)
> return;
> p = rq->curr
> /* ... Do something with p */
>
> into:
>
> p = scx_bpf_remote_curr(cpu);
> /* ... Do something with p */
This looks good to me.
We should probably add a __COMPAT_scx_bpf_remote_curr() macro, so that the
BPF schedulers can be updated to use this new kfunc without breaking the
compatibility with older kernels, but we can do this later, I'll send a
follow-up patch. For now:
Acked-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Thanks,
-Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-02 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-02 11:11 [PATCH v6 0/3] sched_ext: Harden scx_bpf_cpu_rq() Christian Loehle
2025-09-02 11:11 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] sched_ext: Introduce scx_bpf_cpu_rq_locked() Christian Loehle
2025-09-02 11:11 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] sched_ext: Introduce scx_bpf_remote_curr() Christian Loehle
2025-09-02 11:11 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] sched_ext: deprecation warn for scx_bpf_cpu_rq() Christian Loehle
2025-09-02 11:58 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2025-09-02 13:53 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] sched_ext: Harden scx_bpf_cpu_rq() Christian Loehle
2025-09-02 14:10 ` Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aLbb9ljZvAvghZa8@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=hodgesd@meta.com \
--cc=jake@hillion.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.