From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CBBD3126BC for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2025 14:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756823592; cv=none; b=rPExQ5MX4vu1TE5NgEea2FFo9ZnUMqobeKVBXWYfjP2zmRxKEonJdmOSLiKgJKiiz+5Ry5DD4KudtJ3ypEy73L1yAMtpM9GenW2Hs6t4TaBVHWR4qDtTNxGHRX1+XXp+M7qoz3kjqQPRoRWqndborEWXl0iqWNbaOsm63hwpeDo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756823592; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CqeygO38G2UqLYwyJWypxYe4AznIXuR38IzQgfyWO78=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dWLLUi1pzLV0M6xbYj7HZly4iC5TLzYbWVSHZoJsFwX1o5ZM/ewL/2OH2dJtAZ0jTer2TFsJpt/e1z5XOjP1NyWzEPON1GQRVLfCdjGGyE6wKKeJeP7rHXjv+ezauWfnIk4ZiiR5m8VI2YsWUBJNaXcjlJPA8+aMHWn/w74xF8I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=R+NOi+nJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="R+NOi+nJ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1756823591; x=1788359591; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=CqeygO38G2UqLYwyJWypxYe4AznIXuR38IzQgfyWO78=; b=R+NOi+nJrarhs80YhsVfWzBjLjNOh1LR+BDIiUxqfFYOimx7IRISA52F e1tpSpQcfj7/pR/gk6PzacsO2gLM7J5vM4kcwcZzRFRWOCpXX/YOxBJCe IagZlfxytlGfste3qJOvso0JPtFNFMnX5kW6tJOgxGo5k5FfpU/uAIP1p y32SUjuI5fkNZhbKKwPBr88owZIhURVJnijlUyc3soXbz8++L7SvMpYyv d4wFxdequ/Mh+vF3+uCgRowN4z6lLGiRQivs74MyPB8npz4N+UPFq01W9 DfnlZIP9wRWFbvBOGYrEVtR3tX029JZHAcwQcA4dKgwmozC0nshns5ft0 w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2cufVkbPT2iY1SKjC2sxgQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: H8fyFK5hRiK1wM1OzNjtOg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11541"; a="70529012" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,230,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="70529012" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Sep 2025 07:33:10 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: t6YdkPslS0eCpPn1gsG2vA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 2hQHF1LATnKCD8YNAvpqBg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.52]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Sep 2025 07:33:01 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1utS49-0000000AiVG-092e; Tue, 02 Sep 2025 17:32:57 +0300 Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 17:32:56 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Linus Walleij , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Alexey Klimov , Lorenzo Bianconi , Sean Wang , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Paul Cercueil , Kees Cook , Andy Shevchenko , Andrew Morton , David Hildenbrand , Lorenzo Stoakes , "Liam R. Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Mike Rapoport , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko , Dong Aisheng , Fabio Estevam , Shawn Guo , Jacky Bai , Pengutronix Kernel Team , NXP S32 Linux Team , Sascha Hauer , Tony Lindgren , Haojian Zhuang , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Danilo Krummrich , Neil Armstrong , Mark Brown , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski , Konrad Dybcio Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 15/16] pinctrl: qcom: mark the `gpio` and `egpio` pins function as non-strict functions Message-ID: References: <20250902-pinctrl-gpio-pinfuncs-v7-0-bb091daedc52@linaro.org> <20250902-pinctrl-gpio-pinfuncs-v7-15-bb091daedc52@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: imx@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250902-pinctrl-gpio-pinfuncs-v7-15-bb091daedc52@linaro.org> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 01:59:24PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > Allow pins muxed to the "gpio" or "egpio" function to be requested as > GPIOs even if pinmux_ops say the controller should be strict. Why? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko