From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: "Adrian Barnaś" <abarnas@google.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] staging: media: atomisp: Refactor bit logic helpers in vmem.c
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 14:07:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLghfGH1ATFQT-9P@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250903092754.2751556-1-abarnas@google.com>
On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 09:27:52AM +0000, Adrian Barnaś wrote:
> Refactor proposition for bit operation in vmem.c.
> * Previous name for function "inv_subword()" for me is not telling what
> function acctualy does - it clears bit specified by subword, so renamed
> to clear_subword()
> * Added a helper to create a proper bitmask for a subword, without using
> GENMASK(end-1, start) which was claimed to be unsafe
> * Simplified subword() and clear_subword() to be more readable.
>
> Continuation of https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20250902073841.2338568-1-abarnas@google.com/
Thanks for the effort, but I think it's just a tip of the iceberg.
What we really need is to completely rewrite hive_sim_wide_unpack()
and hive_sim_wide_pack(). If we want to preserve arbitrary bit numbers
we ought to use bitmap API rather than that custom approach.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-03 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-03 9:27 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] staging: media: atomisp: Refactor bit logic helpers in vmem.c Adrian Barnaś
2025-09-03 9:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] staging: media: atomisp: Change name to better follow its behavior Adrian Barnaś
2025-09-04 7:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-04 11:43 ` Adrian Barnaś
2025-09-03 9:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] staging: media: atomisp: Simplify logic in vmem.c Adrian Barnaś
2025-09-03 11:07 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aLghfGH1ATFQT-9P@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=abarnas@google.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.