From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA1C6CA1013 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2025 00:07:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.1112852.1461014 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uugSm-0002IA-D1; Sat, 06 Sep 2025 00:07:28 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 1112852.1461014; Sat, 06 Sep 2025 00:07:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uugSm-0002I3-9M; Sat, 06 Sep 2025 00:07:28 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 1112852; Sat, 06 Sep 2025 00:07:27 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uugSl-0002Hx-QA for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2025 00:07:27 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uugSj-008Bba-2y; Sat, 06 Sep 2025 00:07:26 +0000 Received: from [19.12.91.86] (helo=localhost) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uugSj-00073l-2l; Sat, 06 Sep 2025 00:07:26 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xen.org; s=20200302mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID :Subject:Cc:To:Date:From; bh=ESXK1kCG5jcwXm2b5h+fHdnxlmhubehYPJseWVKNRpE=; b= k01ehEm5nJQqShYaZwKjvrgtMaa/CBtFw3zyH/hi0TZwTXLiLHfa/YTGZRO3D4ZMOhnckg0nPAT4M tAYn96Jey+el+sfKCtMxnD1jXv/BcsLO59Pq0CPm/EjcDLOXlJ8ha8OjqHjCQ2kt6mKsjltQKB3I9 CekfAR9LoVqUwtd80=; From: dmukhin@xen.org Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 17:07:24 -0700 To: Jan Beulich Cc: Stefano Stabellini , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, anthony.perard@vates.tech, julien@xen.org, michal.orzel@amd.com, roger.pau@citrix.com, dmukhin@ford.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/15] emul/ns16x50: implement emulator stub Message-ID: References: <20250828235409.2835815-1-dmukhin@ford.com> <20250828235409.2835815-4-dmukhin@ford.com> <7a9210e1-d579-48e1-99ca-1685d7561529@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 04:34:34PM -0700, dmukhin@xen.org wrote: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 11:32:31AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > > On 02.09.2025 01:11, dmukhin@xen.org wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 12:57:43PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > >> On Thu, 28 Aug 2025, dmukhin@xen.org wrote: > > >>> --- a/xen/common/emul/vuart/Kconfig > > >>> +++ b/xen/common/emul/vuart/Kconfig > > >>> @@ -3,4 +3,22 @@ config VUART_FRAMEWORK > > >>> > > >>> menu "UART Emulation" > > >>> > > >>> +config VUART_NS16X50 > > >>> + bool "NS16550-compatible UART Emulator" if EXPERT > > >>> + depends on X86 && HVM > > >>> + select VUART_FRAMEWORK > > >> > > >> default n > > > > > > Ack > > > > No "default n" should ever be put anywhere; it's simply redundant. > > Kept code as is in v6. Sorry, v6 has "default n" update which I need to remove.