From: Elle Rhumsaa <elle@weathered-steel.dev>
To: "Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>
Cc: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lossin@kernel.org, lyude@redhat.com, ojeda@kernel.org,
alex.gaynor@gmail.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, gary@garyguo.net,
a.hindborg@kernel.org, aliceryhl@google.com, tmgross@umich.edu,
dakr@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
will@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com, felipe_life@live.com,
daniel@sedlak.dev, bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com,
daniel.almeida@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/7] add KUnit coverage on ww_mutex/exec implementation
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 23:12:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLtuaHNDoQlBO17q@archiso> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250903131313.4365-8-work@onurozkan.dev>
On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 04:13:13PM +0300, Onur Özkan wrote:
> Adds coverage for `ww_mutex/exec.rs` implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Onur Özkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
> ---
> rust/kernel/sync/lock/ww_mutex/exec.rs | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 148 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/lock/ww_mutex/exec.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/lock/ww_mutex/exec.rs
> index 2f1fc540f0b8..543c5218232a 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/sync/lock/ww_mutex/exec.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/lock/ww_mutex/exec.rs
> @@ -174,3 +174,151 @@ fn cleanup_on_deadlock(&mut self) -> Result {
> Ok(())
> }
> }
> +
> +#[kunit_tests(rust_kernel_ww_exec)]
> +mod tests {
> + use crate::c_str;
> + use crate::prelude::*;
> + use crate::sync::Arc;
> + use pin_init::stack_pin_init;
> +
> + use super::*;
> +
> + #[test]
> + fn test_exec_context_basic_lock_unlock() -> Result {
> + stack_pin_init!(let class = WwClass::new_wound_wait(c_str!("exec_ctx_basic")));
> +
> + let mutex = Arc::pin_init(WwMutex::new(10, &class), GFP_KERNEL)?;
> + let mut ctx = KBox::pin_init(ExecContext::new(&class)?, GFP_KERNEL)?;
> +
> + ctx.lock(&mutex)?;
> + ctx.with_locked(&mutex, |v| {
> + assert_eq!(*v, 10);
> + })?;
> +
> + ctx.release_all_locks();
> + assert!(!mutex.is_locked());
> +
> + Ok(())
> + }
> +
> + #[test]
> + fn test_exec_context_with_locked_mutates_data() -> Result {
> + stack_pin_init!(let class = WwClass::new_wound_wait(c_str!("exec_ctx_with_locked")));
> +
> + let mutex = Arc::pin_init(WwMutex::new(5, &class), GFP_KERNEL)?;
> + let mut ctx = KBox::pin_init(ExecContext::new(&class)?, GFP_KERNEL)?;
> +
> + ctx.lock(&mutex)?;
> +
> + ctx.with_locked(&mutex, |v| {
> + assert_eq!(*v, 5);
> + // Increment the value.
> + *v += 7;
> + })?;
> +
> + ctx.with_locked(&mutex, |v| {
> + // Check that mutation took effect.
> + assert_eq!(*v, 12);
> + })?;
> +
> + Ok(())
> + }
> +
> + #[test]
> + fn test_lock_all_success() -> Result {
> + stack_pin_init!(let class = WwClass::new_wound_wait(c_str!("lock_all_ok")));
> +
> + let mutex1 = Arc::pin_init(WwMutex::new(1, &class), GFP_KERNEL)?;
> + let mutex2 = Arc::pin_init(WwMutex::new(2, &class), GFP_KERNEL)?;
> + let mut ctx = KBox::pin_init(ExecContext::new(&class)?, GFP_KERNEL)?;
> +
> + let res = ctx.lock_all(
> + |ctx| {
> + let _ = ctx.lock(&mutex1)?;
> + let _ = ctx.lock(&mutex2)?;
> + Ok(())
> + },
> + |ctx| {
> + ctx.with_locked(&mutex1, |v| *v += 10)?;
> + ctx.with_locked(&mutex2, |v| *v += 20)?;
> + Ok((
> + ctx.with_locked(&mutex1, |v| *v)?,
> + ctx.with_locked(&mutex2, |v| *v)?,
> + ))
> + },
> + )?;
> +
> + assert_eq!(res, (11, 22));
> + assert!(!mutex1.is_locked());
> + assert!(!mutex2.is_locked());
> +
> + Ok(())
> + }
> +
> + #[test]
> + fn test_with_different_input_type() -> Result {
> + stack_pin_init!(let class = WwClass::new_wound_wait(c_str!("lock_all_ok")));
> +
> + let mutex1 = Arc::pin_init(WwMutex::new(1, &class), GFP_KERNEL)?;
> + let mutex2 = Arc::pin_init(WwMutex::new("hello", &class), GFP_KERNEL)?;
> + let mut ctx = KBox::pin_init(ExecContext::new(&class)?, GFP_KERNEL)?;
> +
> + ctx.lock_all(
> + |ctx| {
> + ctx.lock(&mutex1)?;
> + ctx.lock(&mutex2)?;
> + Ok(())
> + },
> + |ctx| {
> + ctx.with_locked(&mutex1, |v| assert_eq!(*v, 1))?;
> + ctx.with_locked(&mutex2, |v| assert_eq!(*v, "hello"))?;
> + Ok(())
> + },
> + )?;
> +
> + Ok(())
> + }
> +
> + #[test]
> + fn test_lock_all_retries_on_deadlock() -> Result {
> + stack_pin_init!(let class = WwClass::new_wound_wait(c_str!("lock_all_retry")));
> +
> + let mutex = Arc::pin_init(WwMutex::new(99, &class), GFP_KERNEL)?;
> + let mut ctx = KBox::pin_init(ExecContext::new(&class)?, GFP_KERNEL)?;
> + let mut first_try = true;
> +
> + let res = ctx.lock_all(
> + |ctx| {
> + if first_try {
> + first_try = false;
> + // Simulate deadlock on first attempt.
> + return Err(EDEADLK);
> + }
> + ctx.lock(&mutex)
> + },
> + |ctx| {
> + ctx.with_locked(&mutex, |v| {
> + *v += 1;
> + *v
> + })
> + },
> + )?;
> +
> + assert_eq!(res, 100);
> + Ok(())
> + }
> +
> + #[test]
> + fn test_with_locked_on_unlocked_mutex() -> Result {
> + stack_pin_init!(let class = WwClass::new_wound_wait(c_str!("with_unlocked_mutex")));
> +
> + let mutex = Arc::pin_init(WwMutex::new(5, &class), GFP_KERNEL)?;
> + let mut ctx = KBox::pin_init(ExecContext::new(&class)?, GFP_KERNEL)?;
> +
> + let ecode = ctx.with_locked(&mutex, |_v| {}).unwrap_err();
> + assert_eq!(EINVAL, ecode);
> +
> + Ok(())
> + }
> +}
> --
> 2.50.0
>
>
Thanks for adding these tests!
Reviewed-by: Elle Rhumsaa <elle@weathered-steel.dev>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-05 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-03 13:13 [PATCH v6 0/7] rust: add `ww_mutex` support Onur Özkan
2025-09-03 13:13 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] rust: add C wrappers for ww_mutex inline functions Onur Özkan
2025-09-03 13:46 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-09-03 13:13 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] rust: implement `WwClass` for ww_mutex support Onur Özkan
2025-09-03 16:06 ` Boqun Feng
2025-09-04 8:23 ` Onur Özkan
2025-09-03 13:13 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] rust: implement `WwMutex`, `WwAcquireCtx` and `WwMutexGuard` Onur Özkan
2025-09-05 18:49 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-09-05 19:03 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-09-06 11:38 ` Onur
2025-10-22 10:47 ` Onur Özkan
2025-09-06 11:35 ` Onur
2025-09-03 13:13 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] add KUnit coverage on Rust ww_mutex implementation Onur Özkan
2025-09-05 19:04 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-09-03 13:13 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] rust: ww_mutex: add context-free locking functions Onur Özkan
2025-09-05 19:14 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-09-06 11:20 ` Onur
2025-10-21 13:31 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-10-21 13:20 ` Onur Özkan
2025-09-03 13:13 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] rust: ww_mutex/exec: add high-level API Onur Özkan
2025-09-05 19:42 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-09-06 11:13 ` Onur
2025-09-06 15:04 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-09-07 8:20 ` Onur
2025-09-07 8:38 ` Onur
2025-10-21 19:36 ` Onur Özkan
2025-10-21 13:24 ` Onur Özkan
2025-10-21 14:04 ` Onur Özkan
2025-09-05 23:11 ` Elle Rhumsaa
2025-09-06 11:47 ` Onur Özkan
2025-09-03 13:13 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] add KUnit coverage on ww_mutex/exec implementation Onur Özkan
2025-09-05 23:12 ` Elle Rhumsaa [this message]
2025-10-16 19:47 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] rust: add `ww_mutex` support Lyude Paul
2025-10-17 5:03 ` Onur Özkan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aLtuaHNDoQlBO17q@archiso \
--to=elle@weathered-steel.dev \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
--cc=daniel@sedlak.dev \
--cc=felipe_life@live.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.