From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Denis Aleksandrov <daleksan@redhat.com>
Cc: peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>,
Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] tpm: Prevent local DOS via tpm/tpm0/ppi/*operations
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 21:39:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMhdcOZxpqgckC78@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250902142429.14041-2-daleksan@redhat.com>
On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 10:24:30AM -0400, Denis Aleksandrov wrote:
> Reads on tpm/tpm0/ppi/*operations can become very long on
> misconfigured systems. Reading the TPM is a blocking operation,
> thus a user could effectively trigger a DOS.
>
> Resolve this by caching the results and avoiding the blocking
> operations after the first read.
>
> Reported-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Denis Aleksandrov <daleksan@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Removes empty lines.
> - Reorders vars to reverse christmas tree.
>
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ppi.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ppi.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ppi.c
> index d53fce1c9d6f..df34b215440d 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ppi.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ppi.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,20 @@ static const guid_t tpm_ppi_guid =
> GUID_INIT(0x3DDDFAA6, 0x361B, 0x4EB4,
> 0xA4, 0x24, 0x8D, 0x10, 0x08, 0x9D, 0x16, 0x53);
>
> +static const char * const tpm_ppi_info[] = {
> + "Not implemented",
> + "BIOS only",
> + "Blocked for OS by system firmware",
> + "User required",
> + "User not required",
> +};
> +
> +/* A spinlock to protect access to the cache from concurrent reads */
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(tpm_ppi_lock);
> +
> +static u32 ppi_operations_cache[PPI_VS_REQ_END + 1];
> +static bool ppi_cache_populated;
> +
> static bool tpm_ppi_req_has_parameter(u64 req)
> {
> return req == 23;
> @@ -277,8 +291,7 @@ static ssize_t tpm_show_ppi_response(struct device *dev,
> return status;
> }
>
> -static ssize_t show_ppi_operations(acpi_handle dev_handle, char *buf, u32 start,
> - u32 end)
> +static ssize_t cache_ppi_operations(acpi_handle dev_handle, char *buf)
> {
> int i;
> u32 ret;
> @@ -286,34 +299,22 @@ static ssize_t show_ppi_operations(acpi_handle dev_handle, char *buf, u32 start,
> union acpi_object *obj, tmp;
> union acpi_object argv = ACPI_INIT_DSM_ARGV4(1, &tmp);
>
> - static char *info[] = {
> - "Not implemented",
> - "BIOS only",
> - "Blocked for OS by BIOS",
> - "User required",
> - "User not required",
> - };
> -
> if (!acpi_check_dsm(dev_handle, &tpm_ppi_guid, TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID_1,
> 1 << TPM_PPI_FN_GETOPR))
> return -EPERM;
>
> tmp.integer.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
> - for (i = start; i <= end; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i <= PPI_VS_REQ_END; i++) {
> tmp.integer.value = i;
> obj = tpm_eval_dsm(dev_handle, TPM_PPI_FN_GETOPR,
> ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER, &argv,
> TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID_1);
> - if (!obj) {
> + if (!obj)
> return -ENOMEM;
> - } else {
> - ret = obj->integer.value;
> - ACPI_FREE(obj);
> - }
>
> - if (ret > 0 && ret < ARRAY_SIZE(info))
> - len += sysfs_emit_at(buf, len, "%d %d: %s\n",
> - i, ret, info[ret]);
> + ret = obj->integer.value;
> + ppi_operations_cache[i] = ret;
> + ACPI_FREE(obj);
> }
>
> return len;
> @@ -324,9 +325,28 @@ static ssize_t tpm_show_ppi_tcg_operations(struct device *dev,
> char *buf)
> {
> struct tpm_chip *chip = to_tpm_chip(dev);
> + ssize_t len = 0;
> + u32 ret;
> + int i;
> +
> + spin_lock(&tpm_ppi_lock);
> + if (!ppi_cache_populated) {
> + len = cache_ppi_operations(chip->acpi_dev_handle, buf);
> + if (len < 0)
> + return len;
>
> - return show_ppi_operations(chip->acpi_dev_handle, buf, 0,
> - PPI_TPM_REQ_MAX);
> + ppi_cache_populated = true;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i <= PPI_TPM_REQ_MAX; i++) {
> + ret = ppi_operations_cache[i];
> + if (ret >= 0 && ret < ARRAY_SIZE(tpm_ppi_info))
> + len += sysfs_emit_at(buf, len, "%d %d: %s\n",
> + i, ret, tpm_ppi_info[ret]);
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&tpm_ppi_lock);
> +
> + return len;
> }
>
> static ssize_t tpm_show_ppi_vs_operations(struct device *dev,
> @@ -334,9 +354,28 @@ static ssize_t tpm_show_ppi_vs_operations(struct device *dev,
> char *buf)
> {
> struct tpm_chip *chip = to_tpm_chip(dev);
> + ssize_t len = 0;
> + u32 ret;
> + int i;
>
> - return show_ppi_operations(chip->acpi_dev_handle, buf, PPI_VS_REQ_START,
> - PPI_VS_REQ_END);
> + spin_lock(&tpm_ppi_lock);
> + if (!ppi_cache_populated) {
> + len = cache_ppi_operations(chip->acpi_dev_handle, buf);
> + if (len < 0)
> + return len;
> +
> + ppi_cache_populated = true;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = PPI_VS_REQ_START; i <= PPI_VS_REQ_END; i++) {
> + ret = ppi_operations_cache[i];
> + if (ret >= 0 && ret < ARRAY_SIZE(tpm_ppi_info))
> + len += sysfs_emit_at(buf, len, "%d %d: %s\n",
> + i, ret, tpm_ppi_info[ret]);
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&tpm_ppi_lock);
> +
> + return len;
> }
>
> static DEVICE_ATTR(version, S_IRUGO, tpm_show_ppi_version, NULL);
> --
> 2.48.1
>
I don't know how I messed up the patch in my Git but now it is good
(I think):
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd.git/commit/?h=next
Please check before I move forward with the PR.
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-15 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-02 14:24 [PATCH v4] tpm: Prevent local DOS via tpm/tpm0/ppi/*operations Denis Aleksandrov
2025-09-02 17:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-09-02 19:12 ` Denis Aleksandrov
2025-09-10 17:08 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-09-10 17:28 ` Denis Aleksandrov
2025-09-14 17:03 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-09-15 18:39 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2025-09-15 19:17 ` Denis Aleksandrov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aMhdcOZxpqgckC78@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=daleksan@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.