From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] ACPI: property: Return present device nodes only on fwnode interface
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 10:58:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMpqQKhcBNWv5PN9@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916160129.3955410-4-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 07:01:18PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> fwnode_graph_get_next_subnode() may return fwnode backed by ACPI device
> nodes and there has been no check these devices are present in the system,
> unlike there has been on fwnode OF backend. In order to provide consistent
> behaviour towards callers, add a check for device presence by introducing
> a new function acpi_get_next_present_subnode(), used as the
> get_next_child_node() fwnode operation that also checks device node
> presence.
...
> +/**
> + * acpi_get_next_present_subnode - Return the next present child node handle for a fwnode
> + * @fwnode: Firmware node to find the next child node for.
> + * @child: Handle to one of the device's child nodes or a null handle.
> + * Like acpi_get_next_subnode, but the device nodes returned by
acpi_get_next_subnode()
> + * acpi_get_next_present_subnode() are guaranteed to be present.
> + */
Kernel-doc validator is not happy: Missing Return section.
> +static struct fwnode_handle *
> +acpi_get_next_present_subnode(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> + struct fwnode_handle *child)
> +{
> + do {
> + child = acpi_get_next_subnode(fwnode, child);
> + } while (is_acpi_device_node(child) &&
> + !acpi_device_is_present(to_acpi_device_node(child)));
> +
> + return child;
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-17 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-16 16:01 [PATCH 00/14] Align availability checks on fwnode child node enumeration Sakari Ailus
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 01/14] ACPI: property: Use ACPI functions in acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint() only Sakari Ailus
2025-09-17 7:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-17 11:50 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 02/14] ACPI: property: Make acpi_get_next_subnode() static Sakari Ailus
2025-09-17 7:18 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 03/14] ACPI: property: Return present device nodes only on fwnode interface Sakari Ailus
2025-09-17 7:58 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 04/14] property: Drop DEVICE_DISABLED flag in fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() Sakari Ailus
2025-09-17 8:39 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-17 12:19 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 05/14] property: Drop DEVICE_DISABLED flag in fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_count() Sakari Ailus
2025-09-18 19:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 06/14] property: Document that fwnode API returns available nodes Sakari Ailus
2025-09-22 8:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 07/14] driver core: Use fwnode_for_each_child_node() instead Sakari Ailus
2025-09-23 5:43 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 08/14] net: lan966x: " Sakari Ailus
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 09/14] Input: touch-overlay - " Sakari Ailus
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 10/14] media: thp7312: " Sakari Ailus
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 11/14] leds: " Sakari Ailus
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 12/14] leds: Use fwnode_get_next_child_node() instead Sakari Ailus
2025-09-23 5:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-23 8:29 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 13/14] property: Drop functions operating on "available" child nodes Sakari Ailus
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 14/14] spi: cadence: Remove explicit device node availability check Sakari Ailus
2025-09-17 7:07 ` [PATCH 00/14] Align availability checks on fwnode child node enumeration Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aMpqQKhcBNWv5PN9@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.