From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
<daniel@iogearbox.net>, <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>,
<kuba@kernel.org>, <stfomichev@gmail.com>,
<martin.lau@kernel.org>, <mohsin.bashr@gmail.com>,
<noren@nvidia.com>, <dtatulea@nvidia.com>, <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
<tariqt@nvidia.com>, <mbloch@nvidia.com>, <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/6] bpf: Allow bpf_xdp_shrink_data to shrink a frag from head and tail
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:52:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMvIONMZ9CFqyNnM@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250917225513.3388199-2-ameryhung@gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 03:55:08PM -0700, Amery Hung wrote:
> Move skb_frag_t adjustment into bpf_xdp_shrink_data() and extend its
> functionality to be able to shrink an xdp fragment from both head and
> tail. In a later patch, bpf_xdp_pull_data() will reuse it to shrink an
> xdp fragment from head.
>
> Additionally, in bpf_xdp_frags_shrink_tail(), breaking the loop when
> bpf_xdp_shrink_data() returns false (i.e., not releasing the current
> fragment) is not necessary as the loop condition, offset > 0, has the
> same effect. Remove the else branch to simplify the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/net/xdp_sock_drv.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
> net/core/filter.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/xdp_sock_drv.h b/include/net/xdp_sock_drv.h
> index 513c8e9704f6..4f2d3268a676 100644
> --- a/include/net/xdp_sock_drv.h
> +++ b/include/net/xdp_sock_drv.h
> @@ -160,13 +160,23 @@ static inline struct xdp_buff *xsk_buff_get_frag(const struct xdp_buff *first)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static inline void xsk_buff_del_tail(struct xdp_buff *tail)
> +static inline void xsk_buff_del_frag(struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> {
> - struct xdp_buff_xsk *xskb = container_of(tail, struct xdp_buff_xsk, xdp);
> + struct xdp_buff_xsk *xskb = container_of(xdp, struct xdp_buff_xsk, xdp);
>
> list_del(&xskb->list_node);
> }
>
> +static inline struct xdp_buff *xsk_buff_get_head(struct xdp_buff *first)
> +{
> + struct xdp_buff_xsk *xskb = container_of(first, struct xdp_buff_xsk, xdp);
> + struct xdp_buff_xsk *frag;
> +
> + frag = list_first_entry(&xskb->pool->xskb_list, struct xdp_buff_xsk,
> + list_node);
> + return &frag->xdp;
> +}
> +
> static inline struct xdp_buff *xsk_buff_get_tail(struct xdp_buff *first)
> {
> struct xdp_buff_xsk *xskb = container_of(first, struct xdp_buff_xsk, xdp);
> @@ -389,8 +399,13 @@ static inline struct xdp_buff *xsk_buff_get_frag(const struct xdp_buff *first)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -static inline void xsk_buff_del_tail(struct xdp_buff *tail)
> +static inline void xsk_buff_del_frag(struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct xdp_buff *xsk_buff_get_head(struct xdp_buff *first)
> {
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> static inline struct xdp_buff *xsk_buff_get_tail(struct xdp_buff *first)
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 63f3baee2daf..0b82cb348ce0 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -4153,27 +4153,31 @@ static int bpf_xdp_frags_increase_tail(struct xdp_buff *xdp, int offset)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void bpf_xdp_shrink_data_zc(struct xdp_buff *xdp, int shrink,
> +static void bpf_xdp_shrink_data_zc(struct xdp_buff *xdp, int shrink, bool tail,
> enum xdp_mem_type mem_type, bool release)
> {
> - struct xdp_buff *zc_frag = xsk_buff_get_tail(xdp);
> + struct xdp_buff *zc_frag = tail ? xsk_buff_get_tail(xdp) :
> + xsk_buff_get_head(xdp);
>
> if (release) {
> - xsk_buff_del_tail(zc_frag);
> + xsk_buff_del_frag(zc_frag);
> __xdp_return(0, mem_type, false, zc_frag);
> } else {
> - zc_frag->data_end -= shrink;
> + if (tail)
> + zc_frag->data_end -= shrink;
> + else
> + zc_frag->data += shrink;
> }
> }
>
> static bool bpf_xdp_shrink_data(struct xdp_buff *xdp, skb_frag_t *frag,
> - int shrink)
> + int shrink, bool tail)
> {
> enum xdp_mem_type mem_type = xdp->rxq->mem.type;
> bool release = skb_frag_size(frag) == shrink;
>
> if (mem_type == MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL) {
> - bpf_xdp_shrink_data_zc(xdp, shrink, mem_type, release);
> + bpf_xdp_shrink_data_zc(xdp, shrink, tail, mem_type, release);
> goto out;
> }
>
> @@ -4181,6 +4185,12 @@ static bool bpf_xdp_shrink_data(struct xdp_buff *xdp, skb_frag_t *frag,
> __xdp_return(skb_frag_netmem(frag), mem_type, false, NULL);
>
> out:
> + if (!release) {
> + if (!tail)
> + skb_frag_off_add(frag, shrink);
> + skb_frag_size_sub(frag, shrink);
> + }
Hi Amery,
it feels a bit off to have separate conditions around @release. How about
something below?
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 0b82cb348ce0..b1fca279c1de 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -4175,20 +4175,17 @@ static bool bpf_xdp_shrink_data(struct xdp_buff *xdp, skb_frag_t *frag,
{
enum xdp_mem_type mem_type = xdp->rxq->mem.type;
bool release = skb_frag_size(frag) == shrink;
+ bool zc = mem_type == MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL;
- if (mem_type == MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL) {
+ if (zc)
bpf_xdp_shrink_data_zc(xdp, shrink, tail, mem_type, release);
- goto out;
- }
-
- if (release)
- __xdp_return(skb_frag_netmem(frag), mem_type, false, NULL);
-out:
if (!release) {
if (!tail)
skb_frag_off_add(frag, shrink);
skb_frag_size_sub(frag, shrink);
+ } else if (!zc) {
+ __xdp_return(skb_frag_netmem(frag), mem_type, false, NULL);
}
return release;
> +
> return release;
> }
>
> @@ -4198,12 +4208,8 @@ static int bpf_xdp_frags_shrink_tail(struct xdp_buff *xdp, int offset)
>
> len_free += shrink;
> offset -= shrink;
> - if (bpf_xdp_shrink_data(xdp, frag, shrink)) {
> + if (bpf_xdp_shrink_data(xdp, frag, shrink, true))
> n_frags_free++;
> - } else {
> - skb_frag_size_sub(frag, shrink);
> - break;
> - }
> }
> sinfo->nr_frags -= n_frags_free;
> sinfo->xdp_frags_size -= len_free;
> --
> 2.47.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-18 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-17 22:55 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/6] Add kfunc bpf_xdp_pull_data Amery Hung
2025-09-17 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/6] bpf: Allow bpf_xdp_shrink_data to shrink a frag from head and tail Amery Hung
2025-09-18 8:52 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2025-09-18 17:50 ` Amery Hung
2025-09-17 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/6] bpf: Support pulling non-linear xdp data Amery Hung
2025-09-18 9:11 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-09-18 17:56 ` Amery Hung
2025-09-18 20:19 ` Amery Hung
2025-09-17 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/6] bpf: Clear packet pointers after changing packet data in kfuncs Amery Hung
2025-09-17 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/6] bpf: Support specifying linear xdp packet data size for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Amery Hung
2025-09-17 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/6] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_xdp_pull_data Amery Hung
2025-09-18 11:33 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-09-18 19:43 ` Amery Hung
2025-09-17 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/6] selftests: drv-net: Pull data before parsing headers Amery Hung
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-09-19 18:09 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/6] Add kfunc bpf_xdp_pull_data Amery Hung
2025-09-19 18:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/6] bpf: Allow bpf_xdp_shrink_data to shrink a frag from head and tail Amery Hung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aMvIONMZ9CFqyNnM@boxer \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=mohsin.bashr@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noren@nvidia.com \
--cc=paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.