All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
	usamaarif642@gmail.com, yuzhao@google.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, baohua@kernel.org,
	voidice@gmail.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	kaleshsingh@google.com, npache@redhat.com, riel@surriel.com,
	roman.gushchin@linux.dev, rppt@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	dev.jain@arm.com, ryncsn@gmail.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
	surenb@google.com, hughd@google.com, willy@infradead.org,
	matthew.brost@intel.com, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com,
	rakie.kim@sk.com, byungchul@sk.com, gourry@gourry.net,
	ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, apopple@nvidia.com,
	qun-wei.lin@mediatek.com, Andrew.Yang@mediatek.com,
	casper.li@mediatek.com, chinwen.chang@mediatek.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, ioworker0@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/thp: fix MTE tag mismatch when replacing zero-filled subpages
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 17:14:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNLHexcNI53HQ46A@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aNKJ5glToE4hMhWA@arm.com>

On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 12:52:06PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> I just realised that on arm64 with MTE we won't get any merging with the
> zero page even if the user page isn't mapped with PROT_MTE. In
> cpu_enable_mte() we zero the tags in the zero page and set
> PG_mte_tagged. The reason is that we want to use the zero page with
> PROT_MTE mappings (until tag setting causes CoW). Hmm, the arm64
> memcmp_pages() messed up KSM merging with the zero page even before this
> patch.
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
> index e5e773844889..72a1dfc54659 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ int memcmp_pages(struct page *page1, struct page *page2)
>  {
>  	char *addr1, *addr2;
>  	int ret;
> +	bool page1_tagged = page_mte_tagged(page1) && !is_zero_page(page1);
> +	bool page2_tagged = page_mte_tagged(page2) && !is_zero_page(page2);
>  
>  	addr1 = page_address(page1);
>  	addr2 = page_address(page2);
> @@ -83,11 +85,10 @@ int memcmp_pages(struct page *page1, struct page *page2)
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If the page content is identical but at least one of the pages is
> -	 * tagged, return non-zero to avoid KSM merging. If only one of the
> -	 * pages is tagged, __set_ptes() may zero or change the tags of the
> -	 * other page via mte_sync_tags().
> +	 * tagged, return non-zero to avoid KSM merging. Ignore the zero page
> +	 * since it is always tagged with the tags cleared.
>  	 */
> -	if (page_mte_tagged(page1) || page_mte_tagged(page2))
> +	if (page1_tagged || page2_tagged)
>  		return addr1 != addr2;
>  
>  	return ret;

Unrelated to this discussion, I got an internal report that Linux hangs
during boot with CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT because
try_page_mte_tagging() locks up on uninitialised page flags.

Since we (always?) map the zero page as pte_special(), set_pte_at()
won't check if the tags have to be initialised, so we can skip the
PG_mte_tagged altogether. We actually had this code for some time until
we introduced the pte_special() check in set_pte_at().

So alternative patch that also fixes the deferred struct page init (on
the assumptions that the zero page is always mapped as pte_special():

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 7b78c95a9017..e325ba34f45c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -2419,17 +2419,21 @@ static void bti_enable(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused)
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_MTE
 static void cpu_enable_mte(struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const *cap)
 {
+	static bool cleared_zero_page = false;
+
 	sysreg_clear_set(sctlr_el1, 0, SCTLR_ELx_ATA | SCTLR_EL1_ATA0);
 
 	mte_cpu_setup();
 
 	/*
 	 * Clear the tags in the zero page. This needs to be done via the
-	 * linear map which has the Tagged attribute.
+	 * linear map which has the Tagged attribute. Since this page is
+	 * always mapped as pte_special(), set_pte_at() will not attempt to
+	 * clear the tags or set PG_mte_tagged.
 	 */
-	if (try_page_mte_tagging(ZERO_PAGE(0))) {
+	if (!cleared_zero_page) {
+		cleared_zero_page = true;
 		mte_clear_page_tags(lm_alias(empty_zero_page));
-		set_page_mte_tagged(ZERO_PAGE(0));
 	}
 
 	kasan_init_hw_tags_cpu();

-- 
Catalin


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-23 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-22  2:14 [PATCH 1/1] mm/thp: fix MTE tag mismatch when replacing zero-filled subpages Lance Yang
2025-09-22  2:36 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-22  3:36   ` Lance Yang
2025-09-22  3:36     ` Lance Yang
2025-09-22  7:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-22  8:24 ` Usama Arif
2025-09-22 17:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-22 17:59   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-23  1:48     ` Lance Yang
2025-09-23 11:52     ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-23 12:00       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-23 12:04         ` Lance Yang
2025-09-23 12:51         ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-23 17:20         ` Lance Yang
2025-09-23 16:14       ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-09-23 16:40         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-24  2:49         ` Lance Yang
2025-09-24  8:50           ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-24  9:13             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-24  9:34               ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-24  9:44                 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-24  9:59                   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-23  2:10 ` Wei Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aNLHexcNI53HQ46A@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Yang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=casper.li@mediatek.com \
    --cc=cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com \
    --cc=chinwen.chang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=qun-wei.lin@mediatek.com \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=ryncsn@gmail.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
    --cc=voidice@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.