From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02331246BC5 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 15:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758728032; cv=none; b=s1GHTJ20eUF08Y1yvwoeOWxOh5bTBIOf94l/W0kzPMy8dPTmiToWCtlVp2jlJcRImfy4936eCusR8vwJuzP2Xb5EPkOmZsGEVSLFTssTEciMxGy9gbELEpo2OMp0UbY5Lz4qsr1OXgYDPtZ+E/SxDBfym5amfx/Z8PQp07qQ4Is= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758728032; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wRch98PTr07OsPbOEWFR6ZR70W6lFXly25dnPdzBGHc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Disposition; b=bJSMe5duNqQTvuaolewQev4i7lR7Fe8TJb5DFrTQ9I4Azwk54MXOLSvJkwicJh38RPpEfRFAyPiqftHVmpjhzvDCA/zJwX18huMzZfcr5mmyNots4yu46LWj8fd5qR6o/Oov1nhjoTpr/QH60sEjoERTt2RGJ/lsBlSpp7gky8Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=FrVbhAZj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="FrVbhAZj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1758728030; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ic7zvcyBVtaZcEmsf3hW05wAfmOMNZ5JL2VpkYQoXsc=; b=FrVbhAZjnj+3afecM9iyrE8dm4m7eM3bO9kNMWMYSajELoQ3LWp+5t/KXwf0DRetEtgIYJ 9tvyr63oCjkhBxIpB7FEQtNngbjeciwlUJtVZXsW0/6ERUDfM5c3Mh7rIcDIR9VY98+h3q XauT2v1//eTopNsr1NuRTAn9tnroQxk= Received: from mail-qk1-f198.google.com (mail-qk1-f198.google.com [209.85.222.198]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-426-yP7zbkiRMNmE00ekH60rig-1; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 11:33:48 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yP7zbkiRMNmE00ekH60rig-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: yP7zbkiRMNmE00ekH60rig_1758728028 Received: by mail-qk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-856d34460a3so2804985a.1 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:33:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1758728028; x=1759332828; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ic7zvcyBVtaZcEmsf3hW05wAfmOMNZ5JL2VpkYQoXsc=; b=dLC79wGGX9rD82cVkeKFUsTLptS5hh4opxpzRmBz0Ae759/v31dzbSbQQE8t2Z7Ggc gmgr3FFLvEsGacHHV8OvvapBMC7rG5o9pfwwvCJblgzYA/3J/D0RJdnAXf1cpIejpKBE xg1tFVh44rXomyixVVnYuAsTqryNYe2MxBwsCoH+3TneN36ft06q1VCeW1GOIRPvbj0a 4HSOu3fQ5Aw0TiOsKB3Wv4h4MiB9lx/efHjEEDkRcqYRWaDPUXXgqIqsnJvR6Nd59TrI oWkTeWqOvpasP9c9I0wZBKLjN30ZObnqSNDnwDoJ/qej+T0xfg0HYeZQf6hApdJwmZ6I UZWQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW2DKsB6tod3+UwXT3F4zE30GdEDGdhQggh2latj5iGMaz+x0iQ2qcWU7mlONU/3ajPdALmiRVyNQ==@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxW4gU3GJbUHLhdNPKjXt+AN4ACom/cdDi13WGkyWiBrD0v+2HY 0DkCek1j7lWkotmFpcnJdwiXNmZoPj0sG80u+BKhQfifgSV9+SCG38jLqSua5Zlief+6DbM+/XD cOoX7sQ8s/ODDqfVrPlm5Fb4NNq0Cwf/hruJ0lvCpIflsC/VsaVffx1O5Iz4C X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsJr8gJEIFSta3W21mqHm3jhozSg28k3+jzveBQFnlnia5uULmoc25dbYDPL6G 4YNhfgs36zH8dLjkLvxQwb+NGoYWOAiz35f6XNyP/4v3XRsW9jnXpmoA0zZyoSgeSFX/2CHQQiF 0dIkRQ23Ko+AZNPcIjjXdDBuUZ7SqQL36txBx101ceGXXdNwt80xDWyAG+Evoh0tEQC+9usdBsF J0wZNDJeTNxIQ/TsqDPSiro7jdspOjsp4N3iyEco3KhS3nqFn4LRHw5CS4MsVVWTFvooLqvml9K u0wltimevaBmurCKvXNChhNhJnQnEKEhqISH8xe9EDWOfeQZuLJLrpg/nGID81vgPl1tUg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1a89:b0:828:1529:d028 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-85ae7cd4ac1mr7327985a.61.1758728028099; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:33:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE7m0/cbnvCoTKElfyKlC9Akk8QQ848roxwkCAlIQudXokrBobnZdaunrFKeYAlTGXQPxdHhg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1a89:b0:828:1529:d028 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-85ae7cd4ac1mr7322385a.61.1758728027583; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:33:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([2600:382:8504:5608:ca95:838:d4f0:316f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-8363198b0fbsm1167921585a.50.2025.09.24.08.33.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:33:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 11:33:44 -0400 From: Brian Masney To: Peng Fan Cc: Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Sudeep Holla , Cristian Marussi , Marco Felsch , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Dan Carpenter , Geert Uytterhoeven , "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] clk: Support spread spectrum and use it in clk-scmi Message-ID: References: <20250915-clk-ssc-version1-v4-0-5a2cee2f0351@nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.14 (2025-02-20) X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: 0hHOE7qHx32bWqqE0jMZXqOOzl244VplF9lPWRqd_Ks_1758728028 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 02:44:21PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > > Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] clk: Support spread spectrum and use it in clk- > > scmi > > Since clk-scmi.c for spread spectrum support needs some big changes, > we may need to change scmi framework to make OEM extension > in an elegant way. This will needs some time. > > To patch 1-4, do you think is it ok to be in linux tree without patch 5? > If yes, I will post V5 soon with your comments in patch 2 addressed. > Otherwise I have to carry patch 1-4 in future clk-scmi patches. This adds a new API, and there wouldn't be any users of it at this point. Personally, I think it should probably wait and be merged as one series. Unless there's another vendor that's ready to use this. Brian