From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
elver@google.com, dvyukov@google.com, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/memblock: Correct totalram_pages accounting with KMSAN
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 08:25:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNTST_OoeUxLQu-6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250924100301.1558645-1-glider@google.com>
On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 12:03:01PM +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> When KMSAN is enabled, `kmsan_memblock_free_pages()` can hold back pages
> for metadata instead of returning them to the early allocator. The callers,
> however, would unconditionally increment `totalram_pages`, assuming the
> pages were always freed. This resulted in an incorrect calculation of the
> total available RAM, causing the kernel to believe it had more memory than
> it actually did.
>
> This patch refactors `memblock_free_pages()` to return the number of pages
> it successfully frees. If KMSAN stashes the pages, the function now
> returns 0; otherwise, it returns the number of pages in the block.
>
> The callers in `memblock.c` have been updated to use this return value,
> ensuring that `totalram_pages` is incremented only by the number of pages
> actually returned to the allocator. This corrects the total RAM accounting
> when KMSAN is active.
>
> Cc: Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@google.com>
> Fixes: 3c2065098260 ("init: kmsan: call KMSAN initialization routines")
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-25 5:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 10:03 [PATCH v2] mm/memblock: Correct totalram_pages accounting with KMSAN Alexander Potapenko
2025-09-24 13:07 ` Markus Elfring
2025-09-24 13:23 ` Markus Elfring
2025-09-24 13:34 ` Marco Elver
2025-09-25 5:25 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-09-25 12:37 ` SeongJae Park
2025-09-25 12:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-25 14:50 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-26 0:25 ` Wei Yang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-09-24 9:56 Alexander Potapenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aNTST_OoeUxLQu-6@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nogikh@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.