From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 554B0322539 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 21:43:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758836618; cv=none; b=mEIg0dJFIDsr3v6CllQzXqSHCBCN+BoeJzHTTmRofbfaJTyk8UPZYGa8q2gR80zEeiqiJqzzhoFYZLT3ByK7rKxH+ui20Mbqw4K16IqN5o1efOiDsgP1LLIxVYxH1wBechTrTu+S2AY9kdh+h5SSh8o86OQBopsSavMjdlusshM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758836618; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HRjYIPQ6CIvY7Jd3AXBEqdS97gsexFvbnbA0BxIWXiU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rzS4YZuRPE0l98HtA4MvYi8xUAHaLyLc6nFtovmtg1Kz8wQHuWumocvzRQb7kFnRX1eJH1RCQ6ZqPqYBjmsTh/l6uZtQpephBx/GLGz3SwqrWyq++HraJpMtWgezA71XJsxDxYSEkWpfN9UgUFAkEdAUxa5YeXbrdWO/ywEiPHY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=EAEyctSI; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=EAEyctSI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="EAEyctSI"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="EAEyctSI" Received: by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix, from userid 109) id BC1B16026C; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 23:43:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1758836613; bh=yiROxeBvKaWN/NF2xtUyOg+dLnclZe8/BKEI5qbdI+g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EAEyctSIqNK03bhM1b0GhBpMqzjuEpK2fZGwu6GjRSMH+H0D4H+kYVJVMHL0isQ+/ AFYcljcxfm2MFbL44JI+i3IOkosR5bTCzXxM2+O19i68OtkypPxl6IZPh6wHFiY5s6 j+Sj88qi/ue2vsruG5ET9tqbkADIf3qpvLqIdQn9tFy9JDViJ8Gu9qNajAv2kvydAq quwVuYpWn0zamRpUKLSsIhmzPHNHobtmC7Dxj2iivXdmLZ2T8yZpRSC1XMOgduf8gf x016N5VQdaSbm8yJpMqPUJEMkvenmb/vfQb9IPPfMx4m0F1Zmr9yqIlm+EQzDPwTN7 Tp5vMjJTZdGoA== X-Spam-Level: Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 294326026C; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 23:43:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1758836613; bh=yiROxeBvKaWN/NF2xtUyOg+dLnclZe8/BKEI5qbdI+g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EAEyctSIqNK03bhM1b0GhBpMqzjuEpK2fZGwu6GjRSMH+H0D4H+kYVJVMHL0isQ+/ AFYcljcxfm2MFbL44JI+i3IOkosR5bTCzXxM2+O19i68OtkypPxl6IZPh6wHFiY5s6 j+Sj88qi/ue2vsruG5ET9tqbkADIf3qpvLqIdQn9tFy9JDViJ8Gu9qNajAv2kvydAq quwVuYpWn0zamRpUKLSsIhmzPHNHobtmC7Dxj2iivXdmLZ2T8yZpRSC1XMOgduf8gf x016N5VQdaSbm8yJpMqPUJEMkvenmb/vfQb9IPPfMx4m0F1Zmr9yqIlm+EQzDPwTN7 Tp5vMjJTZdGoA== Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 23:43:30 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Jeremy Sowden Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH nft] build: disable --with-unitdir by default Message-ID: References: <20250827140214.645245-1-pablo@netfilter.org> <20250829154350.GE3204340@azazel.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250829154350.GE3204340@azazel.net> On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 04:43:50PM +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote: > On 2025-08-27, at 16:46:15 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > Cc'ing Phil, Jan. > > > > Excuse me my terse proposal description. > > > > Extension: This is an alternative patch to disable --with-unitdir by > > default, to address distcheck issue. > > > > I wonder also if this is a more conservative approach, this should > > integrate more seamlessly into existing pipelines while allowing > > distributors to opt-in to use this. > > > > But maybe I'm worrying too much and it is just fine to change defaults > > for downstream packagers. > > The upshot of this is that the service file is not installed by default, but > the related man-page and the example main.nft still are. Gueesing this is an > oversight? If so, I will send a patch. Yes, it is an oversight. Thanks.