All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
To: Ivan Mikheykin <ivan.mikheykin@flant.com>
Cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] erofs-utils: tar: support archives without end-of-archive entry
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 22:50:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNqcvDiftM3ST7Mn@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250929133222.38815-1-ivan.mikheykin@flant.com>

Hi Ivan,

On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 04:32:22PM +0300, Ivan Mikheykin wrote:
> Tar standard https://www.gnu.org/software/tar/manual/html_node/Standard.html
> says that archive "terminated by an end-of-archive entry,
> which consists of two 512 blocks of zero bytes".
> 
> Is also says:
> 
> "A reasonable system should write such end-of-file marker at the end
> of an archive, but must not assume that such a block exists when
> reading an archive. In particular, GNU tar does not treat missing
> end-of-file marker as an error and silently ignores the fact."
> 
> It is rare for erofs to encounter such problem, as images are mostly
> built with docker or buildah. But if you create image using tar library
> in Golang directly uploading layers to registry, you'll get tar layers
> without end-of-archive block. Running containers with such images will
> trigger this error during extraction:
> 
> mkfs.erofs --tar=f --aufs --quiet -Enoinline_data test.erofs test-no-end.tar
> <E> erofs: failed to read header block @ 42496
> <E> erofs: 	Could not format the device : [Error 5] Input/output error
> 
> This patch fixes the problem by assuming that eof is equal to the end-of-archive.
> 
> Reproducible tar without end-of-archive (base64-encoded gzipped blob):
> H4sICKVi2mgAA3Rlc3QtMTAtMi1ibG9ja3MudGFyAAtzDQr29PdjoCUwAAIzExMwbW5mCqYN
> jQzANBgYGTEYmhqYmpqamRoaGTMYGBqaGJkyKBjQ1FVQUFpcklikoMCQkpmYll9ahFNdYkpu
> Zh49HERfYKhnoWdowGVkYGSqa2Cua2jKNdAuGgX0BADwFwqsAAQAAA==

Thanks for the patch!

Could you confirm how docker/containerd or podman parses such image?

Because the POSIX standard says:
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/pax.html
"At the end of the archive file there shall be two 512-byte blocks filled
with binary zeros, interpreted as an end-of-archive indicator."

So such tar layers will be non-standard, I wonder we need at least
a erofs_warn() message for such tars at least.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Mikheykin <ivan.mikheykin@flant.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-29 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-29 13:32 [PATCH] erofs-utils: tar: support archives without end-of-archive entry Ivan Mikheykin
2025-09-29 14:50 ` Gao Xiang [this message]
2025-09-30  7:42   ` Ivan Mikheykin
2025-09-30  8:01     ` Gao Xiang
2025-09-30  8:08       ` Gao Xiang
2025-10-01 17:13 ` [PATCH v2] " Ivan Mikheykin
2025-10-02  0:39   ` Gao Xiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aNqcvDiftM3ST7Mn@debian \
    --to=xiang@kernel.org \
    --cc=ivan.mikheykin@flant.com \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.