From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Fix a couple of wedge corner-case memory leaks
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 10:04:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aO0xDCa/rTPp9++8@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251013162504.7768-1-stuart.summers@intel.com>
On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 04:24:57PM +0000, Stuart Summers wrote:
> Most of the patches in this series are just adding
> some debug hints to help track these down. I split
> these up in case we want to pick and choose which ones
> to include in the tree. I found them useful.
>
> The main two interesting patches are the last two in the
> series which are fixing some corner cases when the
> driver becomes wedged in the middle of either communication
> with the DRM scheduler or in the event the GuC becomes
> unresponsive. In both of these cases there is a chance
> we could leak memory around the exec queue members
> like the LRC and the LRC BO. These patches fix those
> scenarios.
>
Ok, I think I see the problem. I believe the correct approach is:
- Apply [1]
- Ensure all schedulers are not stopped in guc_submit_wedged_fini
- Clean up any lost H2G in guc_submit_wedged_fini similar to a GT reset
- Wait on all async scheduler work queue opertaions complete somewhere
(this is part of VLK-80263, I was going to try to look at this part
sometime this week).
Matt
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/155417/
> v2: Address feedback from Matt:
> - Let the DRM scheduler handle pausing/unpausing
> - Still do the wait after scheduling disable/deregister
> as with the previous patch, but skip the intermediate
> software-based schedule disable using the "banned"
> flag and instead just jump straight to the deregister
> handling which will fully reset the queue state.
> Note that for this case I am seeing a hardware failure
> after submitting to GuC but before receiving the
> response from GuC. So even if we wedge in this case
> (monitoring the hardware state change), the queue
> itself is not wedged because of the active GuC
> submission (CT is not stalled at that point).
>
> Stuart Summers (7):
> drm/xe: Add additional trace points for LRCs
> drm/xe: Add a trace point for VM close
> drm/xe: Add the BO pointer info to the BO trace
> drm/xe: Add new exec queue trace points
> drm/xe: Correct migration VM teardown order
> drm/xe: Don't block messages to the GPU scheduler
> drm/xe: Check for GuC responses on disabling scheduling
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c | 4 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gpu_scheduler.c | 6 +---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 24 ++++++++++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.c | 4 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lrc.h | 3 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h | 22 ++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace_bo.h | 12 ++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace_lrc.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 2 ++
> 10 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-13 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-13 16:24 [PATCH 0/7] Fix a couple of wedge corner-case memory leaks Stuart Summers
2025-10-13 16:24 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/xe: Add additional trace points for LRCs Stuart Summers
2025-10-13 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/xe: Add a trace point for VM close Stuart Summers
2025-10-13 16:25 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/xe: Add the BO pointer info to the BO trace Stuart Summers
2025-10-13 16:25 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/xe: Add new exec queue trace points Stuart Summers
2025-10-13 16:25 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/xe: Correct migration VM teardown order Stuart Summers
2025-10-13 16:25 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/xe: Don't block messages to the GPU scheduler Stuart Summers
2025-10-13 16:56 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-13 17:17 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-10-13 17:31 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-13 17:38 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-10-13 21:49 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-10-13 16:25 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/xe: Check for GuC responses on disabling scheduling Stuart Summers
2025-10-13 17:04 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2025-10-13 17:13 ` [PATCH 0/7] Fix a couple of wedge corner-case memory leaks Summers, Stuart
2025-10-13 21:48 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-10-13 18:45 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Fix a couple of wedge corner-case memory leaks (rev2) Patchwork
2025-10-13 18:46 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-10-13 19:31 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-10-13 23:13 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-20 21:45 [PATCH 0/7] Fix a couple of wedge corner-case memory leaks Stuart Summers
2025-10-13 22:31 Stuart Summers
2025-10-02 23:04 Stuart Summers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aO0xDCa/rTPp9++8@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.