From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: thomas.falcon@intel.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 0/2] perf record: ratio-to-prev event term for auto counter reload
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2025 16:27:55 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aOAju-lDNHBFnYWx@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251002234308.64218-1-thomas.falcon@intel.com>
On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 06:43:04PM -0500, thomas.falcon@intel.com wrote:
> The goal is to limit event sampling to cases when the branch miss rate
> exceeds 20%. If the branch instructions sample period is exceeded
> first, both events are reloaded. If branch misses exceed their
> threshold first, only the second counter is reloaded, and a sample is
> taken.
> To simplify this, provide a new “ratio-to-prev” event term
> that works alongside the period event option or -c option.
> This would allow users to specify the desired relative rate
> between events as a ratio, making configuration more intuitive.
> With this enhancement, the equivalent command would be:
>
> perf record -e "{cpu_atom/branch-misses/ppu,\
> cpu_atom/branch-instructions,period=1000000,ratio_to_prev=5/u}" \
> -- ./mispredict
> or
> perf record -e "{cpu_atom/branch-misses/ppu,\
> cpu_atom/branch-instructions,ratio-to-prev=5/u}" -c 1000000 \
> -- ./mispredict
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250327195217.2683619-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com/
> v3: rebase to current perf-tools-next
Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next,
- Arnaldo
> v2: (changes below suggested by Ian Rogers):
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-03 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-02 23:43 [Patch v3 0/2] perf record: ratio-to-prev event term for auto counter reload thomas.falcon
2025-10-02 23:43 ` [Patch v3 1/2] perf record: Add ratio-to-prev term thomas.falcon
2025-10-07 8:55 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-10-08 20:30 ` Falcon, Thomas
2025-10-02 23:43 ` [Patch v3 2/2] perf record: Add auto counter reload parse and regression tests thomas.falcon
2025-10-03 19:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2025-10-06 16:23 ` [Patch v3 0/2] perf record: ratio-to-prev event term for auto counter reload Falcon, Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aOAju-lDNHBFnYWx@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.