From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, helgaas@kernel.org, clg@redhat.com,
schnelle@linux.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] PCI: Avoid saving error values for config space
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2025 16:54:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aOE1JMryY_Oa663e@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ae5b191d-ffc6-4d40-a44b-d08e04cac6be@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 10:12:03AM -0700, Farhan Ali wrote:
> AFAIU if the state_saved flag was set to true then any state that we have
> saved should be valid and should be okay to be restored from. We just want
> to avoid saving any invalid data.
The state_saved flag is used by the PCI core to detect whether a driver
has called pci_save_state() in one of its suspend callbacks. If it did,
the PCI core assumes that the driver has taken on the responsibility to
put the device into a low power state. The PCI core will thus not put
the device into a low power state itself and it won't (again) call
pci_save_state().
Hence state_saved is cleared before the driver suspend callbacks are
invoked and it is checked afterwards.
Clearing the state_saved flag in pci_restore_state() merely serves the
purpose of ensuring that the flag is cleared ahead of the next suspend
and resume cycle.
It is a fallacy to think that state_saved indicates validity of the
saved state.
Unfortunately pci_restore_state() was amended by c82f63e411f1 to
bail out if state_saved is false. This has arguably caused more
problems than it solved, so I have prepared this development branch
which essentially reverts the commit and undoes most of the awful
workarounds that it necessitated:
https://github.com/l1k/linux/commits/aer_reset_v1
I intend to submit this after the merge window has closed.
The motivation of c82f63e411f1 was to prevent restoring state if
pci_save_state() hasn't been called before. I am solving that by
calling pci_save_state() on device addition, hence error
recoverability is ensured at all times.
I believe this also makes patch [01/10] in your series unnecessary.
A lot of drivers call pci_save_state() in their probe hook and
that continues to be correct if they modified Config Space
vis-a-vis what was saved on device addition.
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-04 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 17:16 [PATCH v4 00/10] Error recovery for vfio-pci devices on s390x Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] PCI: Avoid saving error values for config space Farhan Ali
2025-10-01 15:15 ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-01 17:12 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-02 9:16 ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-04 14:54 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2025-10-06 17:54 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-06 19:26 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-06 21:35 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-08 13:34 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-08 17:56 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-08 18:14 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-08 21:55 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-09 4:52 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-09 17:02 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-12 6:43 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-09 9:12 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-12 6:34 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-14 12:07 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-16 21:00 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-19 14:34 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 8:59 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-11-22 10:58 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] PCI: Add additional checks for flr reset Farhan Ali
2025-09-30 10:03 ` Benjamin Block
2025-09-30 17:04 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-01 8:33 ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-01 14:37 ` Benjamin Block
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] PCI: Allow per function PCI slots Farhan Ali
2025-10-01 14:34 ` Benjamin Block
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] s390/pci: Add architecture specific resource/bus address translation Farhan Ali
2025-09-25 10:54 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-01 16:04 ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-01 18:01 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-02 12:58 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-02 17:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-02 17:16 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-02 18:14 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] s390/pci: Restore IRQ unconditionally for the zPCI device Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] s390/pci: Update the logic for detecting passthrough device Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] s390/pci: Store PCI error information for passthrough devices Farhan Ali
2025-09-25 14:28 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-25 16:29 ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] vfio-pci/zdev: Add a device feature for error information Farhan Ali
2025-09-25 8:04 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] vfio: Add a reset_done callback for vfio-pci driver Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] vfio: Remove the pcie check for VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX Farhan Ali
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aOE1JMryY_Oa663e@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.