From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/dmc: Use drm_WARN_ONCE()
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 20:57:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aO_goOiwQwo41tQW@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251015135042.16744-1-pvorel@suse.cz>
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 03:50:42PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> assert_dmc_loaded() removed in 43175c92d4038 used drm_WARN_ONCE(),
> but new assert_dmc_loaded() use drm_WARN().
>
> Log is already noise quite a lot due loop over dmc->dmc_info[dmc_id]
> array (76 logs on my machine), therefore use drm_WARN_ONCE().
>
> Fixes: 43175c92d4038 ("drm/i915/dmc: Assert DMC is loaded harder")
> Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> ---
> Ville, am I wrong and it's really needed to see all the oops for the
> threads?
Kinda irrelevant because this should never happen. So the real
question we need to ask is why are you seeing this at all?
Please file a bug at
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues
and attch the full dmesg with drm.debug=0xe passed to the kernel
cmdline.
>
> Kind regards,
> Petr
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> index 517bebb0b4aac..53db7279c7c99 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> @@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ static void assert_dmc_loaded(struct intel_display *display,
> found = intel_de_read(display, DMC_PROGRAM(dmc->dmc_info[dmc_id].start_mmioaddr, 0));
> expected = dmc->dmc_info[dmc_id].payload[0];
>
> - drm_WARN(display->drm, found != expected,
> + drm_WARN_ONCE(display->drm, found != expected,
> "DMC %d program storage start incorrect (expected 0x%x, current 0x%x)\n",
> dmc_id, expected, found);
>
> @@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ static void assert_dmc_loaded(struct intel_display *display,
> expected &= ~DMC_EVT_CTL_ENABLE;
> }
>
> - drm_WARN(display->drm, found != expected,
> + drm_WARN_ONCE(display->drm, found != expected,
> "DMC %d mmio[%d]/0x%x incorrect (expected 0x%x, current 0x%x)\n",
> dmc_id, i, i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg), expected, found);
> }
> --
> 2.51.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-15 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 13:50 [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/dmc: Use drm_WARN_ONCE() Petr Vorel
2025-10-15 17:18 ` ✗ LGCI.VerificationFailed: failure for series starting with [1/1] " Patchwork
2025-10-15 17:57 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2025-10-16 12:55 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aO_goOiwQwo41tQW@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.