From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9D83288515 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:01:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760601706; cv=none; b=QkExB1ar5hVbBbvsDP4kI13voNJqscFz+wjFJQ7Qmvh9RoPMHzBM6udfS3qCL9D9GevcrViMXk/5q9b0IGNNeZnZfzWhUMIGCKKRLDk1VeVNGq7bgb0ObjQ05wkT7kp60LR4xRyLbvxXXKfJ2EXDN6bVbXgFo8lHQ0CtshcNeBg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760601706; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ua3pqrz+jWQC1IsyYn6xel+EbNBYCSK2YqeOPRApC3I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GqJ5oRfNh4EPwbd1cM969nXo35rTzZ99Iw+yqp3aSbI3XJgx5IEcVmUBeDH6Hvt92u4KnyipWn3P+Xlv/xKNq2l8niOZHTNVKgQMEZ/IjdFs4xYMuxRKz6sCJHVdgZK17j79rAz97QPTJGi6CbAD+2XNLXzJLYW7SPSpcKpXQRo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=gEhAl96T; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="gEhAl96T" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=KaQl fOLQxAbgj+NhEIrNg1dhz5+ieYrTAINZg1rmjh8=; b=gEhAl96Thq6ifvpiapx3 gVlGfr72Akr/W8tKGsh8WGEcimWzR6dpM9uoXzRKOE9HyT+eUArLlqqVxkQT8YBg opSkPRumvZLvau/ztt42WSkRgWIh3i/h9HBY6RSUbJumWF6K/M2RUYSSMM+Zj9E0 IIiD3MgWFZMx6qudOh8lMt7kBaT641LJPuG3dtPA55VPfcGfqOtAnN33G1QpJ55L eaUiYfNjACn5q2kp/qPj3AQEK6enpkL+KhniwTUnoGSuBGxZpiLRYMqQh5zZARbu v0tzHRvwOMhF6evHH3uMFtALiLn2ObVIxjSW3w8wAK0LJqzrTae0jrIE8tUn4cdt 2Q== Received: (qmail 3717946 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2025 10:01:42 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 16 Oct 2025 10:01:42 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@WoERB0JBeKkgAwDPXwQHAL/S9V79e5yL Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 10:01:42 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Marek Vasut Cc: Marek Vasut , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Niklas =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=B6derlund?= , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Daniel Lezcano , Geert Uytterhoeven , Lukasz Luba , Magnus Damm , Zhang Rui , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] thermal/drivers/rcar_gen3: Document R-Car Gen4 and RZ/G2 support in driver comment Message-ID: References: <20251015155905.186612-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> <62670d89-56f2-419e-8f80-0536858415f3@mailbox.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <62670d89-56f2-419e-8f80-0536858415f3@mailbox.org> > > I am not opposed to the patch. Just want to mention that such > > information gets stale all the time, so I would suggest: > > > > + R-Car Gen3 THS and compatible thermal sensor driver > This won't cover RZ/G2 which something else, and Gen5 seems like it will be > also a bit different, so maybe the list is now exhaustive? Sorry, I don't understand: If RZ/xx THS is compatible with R-Car Gen3 THS, why is this not covered?