Re: [PATCH] tests: use macros for registering char tests for sockets

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 02:30:47PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2025 at 14:27, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > The test-char.c has a couple of helper macros for registering tests that
> > need to be repeated for both IP and UNIX sockets. One test case was not
> > using the macro though.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  tests/unit/test-char.c | 8 +++-----
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/unit/test-char.c b/tests/unit/test-char.c
> > index f30a39f61f..3c9f0a68e8 100644
> > --- a/tests/unit/test-char.c
> > +++ b/tests/unit/test-char.c
> > @@ -1969,19 +1969,17 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >      g_test_add_data_func("/char/socket/client/reconnect-error/" # name, \
> >                           &client7 ##name, char_socket_client_test);     \
> >      g_test_add_data_func("/char/socket/client/dupid-reconnect/" # name, \
> > -                         &client8 ##name, char_socket_client_dupid_test)
> > +                         &client8 ##name, char_socket_client_dupid_test); \
> > +    g_test_add_data_func("/char/socket/server/two-clients/" # name,     \
> > +                         addr, char_socket_server_two_clients_test)
> >
> >      if (has_ipv4) {
> >          SOCKET_SERVER_TEST(tcp, &tcpaddr);
> >          SOCKET_CLIENT_TEST(tcp, &tcpaddr);
> > -        g_test_add_data_func("/char/socket/server/two-clients/tcp", &tcpaddr,
> > -                             char_socket_server_two_clients_test);
> >      }
> >  #ifndef WIN32
> >      SOCKET_SERVER_TEST(unix, &unixaddr);
> >      SOCKET_CLIENT_TEST(unix, &unixaddr);
> > -    g_test_add_data_func("/char/socket/server/two-clients/unix", &unixaddr,
> > -                         char_socket_server_two_clients_test);
> >  #endif
> 
> This is a "server" test, but it looks like you've added it to
> the SOCKET_CLIENT_TEST macro instead of the SOCKET_SERVER_TEST macro ?

Opps, yes, though it raises the question of why we have separate
macros for server vs client tests instead of one.


With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|