All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc: "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
	 "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dan J Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	 "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Rick P Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	 "binbin.wu@linux.intel.com" <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: TDX: WARN if a SEAMCALL VM-Exit makes its way out to KVM
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 10:25:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPJ8A8u8zIvp-wB4@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46eb76240a29cb81b6a8aa41016466810abef559.camel@intel.com>

On Fri, Oct 17, 2025, Kai Huang wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-10-16 at 11:21 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > WARN if KVM observes a SEAMCALL VM-Exit while running a TD guest, as the
> > TDX-Module is supposed to inject a #UD, per the "Unconditionally Blocked
> > Instructions" section of the TDX-Module base specification.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> > index 097304bf1e1d..ffcfe95f224f 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> > @@ -2148,6 +2148,9 @@ int tdx_handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, fastpath_t fastpath)
> >  		 * - If it's not an MSMI, no need to do anything here.
> >  		 */
> >  		return 1;
> > +	case EXIT_REASON_SEAMCALL:
> > +		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> > +		break;
> > 
> 
> While this exit should never happen from a TDX guest, I am wondering why
> we need to explicitly handle the SEAMCALL?  E.g., per "Unconditionally
> Blocked Instructions" ENCLS/ENCLV are also listed, therefore
> EXIT_REASON_ELCLS/ENCLV should never come from a TDX guest either.

Good point.  SEAMCALL was obviously top of mind, I didn't think about all the
other exits that should be impossible.

I haven't looked closely, at all, but I wonder if we can get away with this?

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
index 097304bf1e1d..4c68444bd673 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
@@ -2149,6 +2149,8 @@ int tdx_handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, fastpath_t fastpath)
                 */
                return 1;
        default:
+               /* All other known exits should be handled by the TDX-Module. */
+               WARN_ON_ONCE(exit_reason.basic <= EXIT_REASON_TDCALL);
                break;
        }

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-17 17:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-16 18:21 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: VMX: Handle SEAMCALL or TDCALL VM-Exits Sean Christopherson
2025-10-16 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: VMX: Inject #UD if guest tries to execute SEAMCALL or TDCALL Sean Christopherson
2025-10-17  2:53   ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-10-17  5:27   ` Binbin Wu
2025-10-17 10:53   ` Huang, Kai
2025-10-17 13:00     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-17 20:34       ` Huang, Kai
2025-10-17 20:34   ` Huang, Kai
2025-10-16 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: TDX: WARN if a SEAMCALL VM-Exit makes its way out to KVM Sean Christopherson
2025-10-17  2:56   ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-10-17  5:29   ` Binbin Wu
2025-10-17 10:40   ` Huang, Kai
2025-10-17 17:25     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-10-17 20:58       ` Huang, Kai
2025-10-17 21:11         ` Huang, Kai
2025-10-20  6:10         ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-10-20 15:03           ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-04 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: VMX: Handle SEAMCALL or TDCALL VM-Exits Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aPJ8A8u8zIvp-wB4@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.