From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org,
praan@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-selftests: Use KUnit
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 17:59:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPKEEuCYbbJbN9Cr@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251017141312.GP3938986@ziepe.ca>
On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 11:13:12AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 01:04:49PM +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
>
> > Is simple enough and verbose and can distinguished from test failures,
> > it will look like:
> > [ 2.095812] ok 1 arm_lpae_do_selftests # SKIP Failed to allocated device!
> ^^^^^
>
> The test "passed" though, and since we never expect this failure it
> seems wrong to make it pass.
>
> I think there is no point in distinguishing "infrastructure" from
> anything else. Either the test runs to completion and does everything,
> or it fails.
>
> The use of skip is for things where we probe something and detect we
> can't run the test. Like maybe you have a test that relies on
> PAGE_SIZE=4096, or CONFIG_XX so skip other systems.
>
> While, "I hit an OOM so I skip the test" seems wrong to me. Maybe the
> OOM was caused by the "unit under test" leaking memory??
I see, both are fine with me, it seems the kunit maintainer is more
inclined twords the failure approach [1].
So, I can keep the test failing, is it OK Robin?
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CABVgOS=NfRcXYzJVMMKqeXP8SyTewffwb7vdGN1D8esO2f0KOA@mail.gmail.com/
Thanks,
Mostafa
>
> Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-17 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-29 15:49 [PATCH v5 0/4] Move io-pgtable-arm selftest to KUnit Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-29 15:49 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Simplify error prints for selftests Mostafa Saleh
2025-10-14 11:09 ` Robin Murphy
2025-10-15 9:41 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-29 15:49 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Move selftests to a separate file Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-29 15:49 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-selftests: Modularize the test Mostafa Saleh
2025-09-29 15:49 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-selftests: Use KUnit Mostafa Saleh
2025-10-14 13:43 ` Robin Murphy
2025-10-15 9:53 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-10-15 13:51 ` Robin Murphy
2025-10-15 15:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-16 17:17 ` Robin Murphy
2025-10-16 17:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-17 13:04 ` Mostafa Saleh
2025-10-17 14:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-17 17:59 ` Mostafa Saleh [this message]
2025-10-13 9:32 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] Move io-pgtable-arm selftest to KUnit Mostafa Saleh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPKEEuCYbbJbN9Cr@google.com \
--to=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.