Re: [PATCH mm-unstable] vmalloc: Separate gfp_mask adjunctive parentheses in __vmalloc_node_noprof() kernel-doc comment

[Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 11:49:33AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Sphinx reports htmldocs warning on __vmalloc_node() comment:
> 
> Documentation/core-api/mm-api:52: ./mm/vmalloc.c:4036: WARNING: Inline strong start-string without end-string. [docutils]
> 
> Fix it by separating adjunctive parentheses from preceding gfp_mask
> formatting markup.
> 
> Fixes: 32904ba6f5ef ("vmalloc: update __vmalloc_node_noprof() documentation")
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20251020134902.3a11107e@canb.auug.org.au/
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index e207ca64a688ee..091a07f6d92524 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -4034,7 +4034,7 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range_noprof(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
>   * Allocate enough pages to cover @size from the page level allocator with
>   * @gfp_mask flags.  Map them into contiguous kernel virtual space.
>   *
> - * Semantics of @gfp_mask(including reclaim/retry modifiers such as
> + * Semantics of @gfp_mask (including reclaim/retry modifiers such as
>   * __GFP_NOFAIL) are the same as in __vmalloc_node_range_noprof().
>   *
>   * Return: pointer to the allocated memory or %NULL on error
> -- 
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
> 
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>

Thank you!

--
Uladzislau Rezki