From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBCD3CCD1BB for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:38:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736E8409F2; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:38:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id OPFM3iz7_C0N; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:38:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=140.211.166.142; helo=lists1.osuosl.org; envelope-from=intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org; receiver= DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org AF82C409F1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=osuosl.org; s=default; t=1761143923; bh=/coiQbSe12Q5krk1URbQ26p769UEH0Xgzk14Hhsx2zs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=dclOLuHB+UDSIiiHqMTuydOfIYy3+29rUle3WhtSzFGyCH/TniWKppmVpArJWZlJf yQE9Dr/AZ9nUnfeXPNQzqrsXTPe6S7tzvbsBJB0s0YTET5rJRUJW1d7b08bntOMRWv F+TQohfonJBArsmI2T34Bges7pEZrJS0gevm1M95j5kUOBc1ZnXIKcK41kK92kx8cR lmfIjcbxaV5GBmlh3EXfUVlFcNuepYFa1Vj5axS5sggpnY4vrCWZpGW8pPP3zenU7m 9iR3FNWKThyjnkJzqSoTL+aj7o9P4HnWS/lsitG5ofHsVsgG7ZK3ssDY7bl7YZLpVk EPBaZZlK0D3Og== Received: from lists1.osuosl.org (lists1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.142]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF82C409F1; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:38:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by lists1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD3970A for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1F383626 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:38:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id pMKRlYLX8Qre for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25; helo=tor.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=horms@kernel.org; receiver= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp1.osuosl.org 0BFA283265 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 0BFA283265 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org (tor.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BFA283265 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:38:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6448860209; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EABF9C4CEE7; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:38:36 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Alok Tiwari Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, alok.a.tiwarilinux@gmail.com Message-ID: References: <20251021184108.2390121-1-alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251021184108.2390121-1-alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com> X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761143920; bh=5OLoP/JafLChQU6zqWjThxLWCd9/hPsGnsvrMaiR+CA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=P+h/Ls+RjFImMpD83TtltRkQ6BrDJ/DcEnv8tD0j6ZZo7s06PmTY/gCZtQTzepef+ YwUzY/7FslYtyZ8PII1aamj7oujylD7o7GX1U2s6VKWSot+Oqpf0qLGwcFpKth608J 6dCAABdcDK6E3ksU/9cTrLdwM12GFpVMzz7Y/qn4P+rOEDwGr/SPhPl0oeitGMG4XA WeWEakHkh8mim9F0Km7cnAJCaRDUzpIzgbp7OK5+1SHuIyO1vTR6cUvFeRmA5GRV+U D4wZG+tNlQVIni1DjWxYwdxgKLljKoUurUyNy8+R8T2Jwyg1jll+tK/yDYbv8IZoIM 9XWDyFmwtxUZA== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=P+h/Ls+R Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 1/2] idpf: correct queue index in Rx allocation error messages X-BeenThere: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Wired Ethernet Linux Kernel Driver Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org Sender: "Intel-wired-lan" On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 11:40:54AM -0700, Alok Tiwari wrote: > The error messages in idpf_rx_desc_alloc_all() used the group index i > when reporting memory allocation failures for individual Rx and Rx buffer > queues. The correct index to report is j, which represents the specific > queue within the group. > > Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari Reviewed-by: Simon Horman ... From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C62B35BDC8 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761143920; cv=none; b=aJgLyMOJY2rjvSwdG1vMIY04NUJMJgoVrMgdzSBi1nZlX/JDE6wQWTmugcNmZCohGy9S0whz1dDLl/qwi39W93T6GXKOAL2vgifXo6Hn9dZxdoI18SzKVla2BduBf6ySdfQGbegi3M54dXABENg2l+RFTmlQntk19oEH8BfC5cI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761143920; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5OLoP/JafLChQU6zqWjThxLWCd9/hPsGnsvrMaiR+CA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZI8++pq5EuwR92S6y0zDxNh04bRlkizT9orMLKIcBBs/kYKrlnfP5jQpeyyu52txX4bKIgPKpz0UHEKUu0ugQpajKeqUydZkLwHgK+kR7mJQE6eIgI2gDn2qniTYWicLxSDo2/RzJctyZEakm3Zg6vx+L0ueR26B2LLsYzW39kE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=P+h/Ls+R; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="P+h/Ls+R" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EABF9C4CEE7; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:38:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761143920; bh=5OLoP/JafLChQU6zqWjThxLWCd9/hPsGnsvrMaiR+CA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=P+h/Ls+RjFImMpD83TtltRkQ6BrDJ/DcEnv8tD0j6ZZo7s06PmTY/gCZtQTzepef+ YwUzY/7FslYtyZ8PII1aamj7oujylD7o7GX1U2s6VKWSot+Oqpf0qLGwcFpKth608J 6dCAABdcDK6E3ksU/9cTrLdwM12GFpVMzz7Y/qn4P+rOEDwGr/SPhPl0oeitGMG4XA WeWEakHkh8mim9F0Km7cnAJCaRDUzpIzgbp7OK5+1SHuIyO1vTR6cUvFeRmA5GRV+U D4wZG+tNlQVIni1DjWxYwdxgKLljKoUurUyNy8+R8T2Jwyg1jll+tK/yDYbv8IZoIM 9XWDyFmwtxUZA== Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:38:36 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Alok Tiwari Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, alok.a.tiwarilinux@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] idpf: correct queue index in Rx allocation error messages Message-ID: References: <20251021184108.2390121-1-alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251021184108.2390121-1-alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com> On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 11:40:54AM -0700, Alok Tiwari wrote: > The error messages in idpf_rx_desc_alloc_all() used the group index i > when reporting memory allocation failures for individual Rx and Rx buffer > queues. The correct index to report is j, which represents the specific > queue within the group. > > Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari Reviewed-by: Simon Horman ...