From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
Ryan Afranji <afranji@google.com>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Roger Wang <runanwang@google.com>,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
"Pratik R. Sampat" <pratikrajesh.sampat@amd.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>,
Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 21/21] KVM: selftests: Add TDX lifecycle test
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 09:18:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPum5qJjFH49YVyy@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250925172851.606193-22-sagis@google.com>
On Thu, Sep 25, 2025, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/tdx/tdx_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/tdx/tdx_util.c
> index 53cfadeff8de..714413e062fd 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/tdx/tdx_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/tdx/tdx_util.c
> @@ -328,3 +328,21 @@ void vm_tdx_finalize(struct kvm_vm *vm)
> load_td_private_memory(vm);
> vm_tdx_vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_TDX_FINALIZE_VM, 0, NULL);
> }
> +
> +struct kvm_vm *vm_tdx_create_with_one_vcpu(void *guest_code,
> + struct kvm_vcpu **vcpu)
> +{
> + struct vm_shape shape = {
> + .mode = VM_MODE_DEFAULT,
> + .type = KVM_X86_TDX_VM,
> + };
> + struct kvm_vm *vm;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpus[1];
> +
> + vm = __vm_create_with_vcpus(shape, 1, 0, guest_code, vcpus);
> + *vcpu = vcpus[0];
> +
> + vm_tdx_finalize(vm);
> +
> + return vm;
> +}
Rather than add a full wrapper, and duplicate all of vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(),
we should just add macros to convert a type to a shape.
E.g. with this, you can simply add:
#define VM_SHAPE_TDX VM_TYPE(KVM_X86_TDX_VM)
And coupled with Ira's suggestion regarding vm_tdx_finalize(), there should be
no need for vm_tdx_create_with_one_vcpu().
--
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 09:14:43 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Add macros so simplify creating VM shapes for
non-default types
Add VM_TYPE() and __VM_TYPE() macros to create a vm_shape structure given
a type (and mode), and use the macros to define VM_SHAPE_{SEV,SEV_ES,SNP}
shapes for x86's SEV family of VM shapes. Providing common infrastructure
will avoid having to copy+paste vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu() for TDX.
Use the new SEV+ shapes and drop vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu().
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
.../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h | 14 +++++++
.../selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h | 4 ++
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/sev.h | 2 -
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/sev.c | 16 --------
.../selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c | 40 +++++++++----------
5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
index af52cd938b50..af0b53987c06 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
@@ -210,6 +210,20 @@ kvm_static_assert(sizeof(struct vm_shape) == sizeof(uint64_t));
shape; \
})
+#define __VM_TYPE(__mode, __type) \
+({ \
+ struct vm_shape shape = { \
+ .mode = (__mode), \
+ .type = (__type) \
+ }; \
+ \
+ shape; \
+})
+
+#define VM_TYPE(__type) \
+ __VM_TYPE(VM_MODE_DEFAULT, __type)
+
+
#if defined(__aarch64__)
extern enum vm_guest_mode vm_mode_default;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h
index 51cd84b9ca66..dd21e11e1908 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h
@@ -362,6 +362,10 @@ static inline unsigned int x86_model(unsigned int eax)
return ((eax >> 12) & 0xf0) | ((eax >> 4) & 0x0f);
}
+#define VM_SHAPE_SEV VM_TYPE(KVM_X86_SEV_VM)
+#define VM_SHAPE_SEV_ES VM_TYPE(KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM)
+#define VM_SHAPE_SNP VM_TYPE(KVM_X86_SNP_VM)
+
/* Page table bitfield declarations */
#define PTE_PRESENT_MASK BIT_ULL(0)
#define PTE_WRITABLE_MASK BIT_ULL(1)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/sev.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/sev.h
index 008b4169f5e2..3c3294599ba6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/sev.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/sev.h
@@ -53,8 +53,6 @@ void snp_vm_launch_start(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint64_t policy);
void snp_vm_launch_update(struct kvm_vm *vm);
void snp_vm_launch_finish(struct kvm_vm *vm);
-struct kvm_vm *vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(uint32_t type, void *guest_code,
- struct kvm_vcpu **cpu);
void vm_sev_launch(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint64_t policy, uint8_t *measurement);
kvm_static_assert(SEV_RET_SUCCESS == 0);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/sev.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/sev.c
index c3a9838f4806..1e3f6514c28d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/sev.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/sev.c
@@ -158,22 +158,6 @@ void snp_vm_launch_finish(struct kvm_vm *vm)
vm_sev_ioctl(vm, KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH, &launch_finish);
}
-struct kvm_vm *vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(uint32_t type, void *guest_code,
- struct kvm_vcpu **cpu)
-{
- struct vm_shape shape = {
- .mode = VM_MODE_DEFAULT,
- .type = type,
- };
- struct kvm_vm *vm;
- struct kvm_vcpu *cpus[1];
-
- vm = __vm_create_with_vcpus(shape, 1, 0, guest_code, cpus);
- *cpu = cpus[0];
-
- return vm;
-}
-
void vm_sev_launch(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint64_t policy, uint8_t *measurement)
{
if (is_sev_snp_vm(vm)) {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c
index 77256c89bb8d..3903793c6750 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void compare_xsave(u8 *from_host, u8 *from_guest)
abort();
}
-static void test_sync_vmsa(uint32_t type, uint64_t policy)
+static void test_sync_vmsa(struct vm_shape shape, uint64_t policy)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static void test_sync_vmsa(uint32_t type, uint64_t policy)
double x87val = M_PI;
struct kvm_xsave __attribute__((aligned(64))) xsave = { 0 };
- vm = vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(type, guest_code_xsave, &vcpu);
+ vm = vm_create_shape_with_one_vcpu(shape, &vcpu, guest_code_xsave);
gva = vm_vaddr_alloc_shared(vm, PAGE_SIZE, KVM_UTIL_MIN_VADDR,
MEM_REGION_TEST_DATA);
hva = addr_gva2hva(vm, gva);
@@ -120,13 +120,13 @@ static void test_sync_vmsa(uint32_t type, uint64_t policy)
kvm_vm_free(vm);
}
-static void test_sev(void *guest_code, uint32_t type, uint64_t policy)
+static void test_sev(void *guest_code, struct vm_shape shape, uint64_t policy)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
struct ucall uc;
- vm = vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(type, guest_code, &vcpu);
+ vm = vm_create_shape_with_one_vcpu(shape, &vcpu, guest_code);
/* TODO: Validate the measurement is as expected. */
vm_sev_launch(vm, policy, NULL);
@@ -171,12 +171,12 @@ static void guest_shutdown_code(void)
__asm__ __volatile__("ud2");
}
-static void test_sev_shutdown(uint32_t type, uint64_t policy)
+static void test_sev_shutdown(struct vm_shape shape, uint64_t policy)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
- vm = vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(type, guest_shutdown_code, &vcpu);
+ vm = vm_create_shape_with_one_vcpu(shape, &vcpu, guest_shutdown_code);
vm_sev_launch(vm, policy, NULL);
@@ -188,28 +188,28 @@ static void test_sev_shutdown(uint32_t type, uint64_t policy)
kvm_vm_free(vm);
}
-static void test_sev_smoke(void *guest, uint32_t type, uint64_t policy)
+static void test_sev_smoke(void *guest, struct vm_shape shape, uint64_t policy)
{
const u64 xf_mask = XFEATURE_MASK_X87_AVX;
- if (type == KVM_X86_SNP_VM)
- test_sev(guest, type, policy | SNP_POLICY_DBG);
+ if (shape.type == KVM_X86_SNP_VM)
+ test_sev(guest, shape, policy | SNP_POLICY_DBG);
else
- test_sev(guest, type, policy | SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
- test_sev(guest, type, policy);
+ test_sev(guest, shape, policy | SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
+ test_sev(guest, shape, policy);
- if (type == KVM_X86_SEV_VM)
+ if (shape.type == KVM_X86_SEV_VM)
return;
- test_sev_shutdown(type, policy);
+ test_sev_shutdown(shape, policy);
if (kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_XCRS) &&
(xgetbv(0) & kvm_cpu_supported_xcr0() & xf_mask) == xf_mask) {
- test_sync_vmsa(type, policy);
- if (type == KVM_X86_SNP_VM)
- test_sync_vmsa(type, policy | SNP_POLICY_DBG);
+ test_sync_vmsa(shape, policy);
+ if (shape.type == KVM_X86_SNP_VM)
+ test_sync_vmsa(shape, policy | SNP_POLICY_DBG);
else
- test_sync_vmsa(type, policy | SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
+ test_sync_vmsa(shape, policy | SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
}
}
@@ -217,13 +217,13 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEV));
- test_sev_smoke(guest_sev_code, KVM_X86_SEV_VM, 0);
+ test_sev_smoke(guest_sev_code, VM_SHAPE_SEV, 0);
if (kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEV_ES))
- test_sev_smoke(guest_sev_es_code, KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM, SEV_POLICY_ES);
+ test_sev_smoke(guest_sev_es_code, VM_SHAPE_SEV_ES, SEV_POLICY_ES);
if (kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP))
- test_sev_smoke(guest_snp_code, KVM_X86_SNP_VM, snp_default_policy());
+ test_sev_smoke(guest_snp_code, VM_SHAPE_SNP, snp_default_policy());
return 0;
}
base-commit: 4cc167c50eb19d44ac7e204938724e685e3d8057
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-24 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-25 17:28 [PATCH v11 00/21] TDX KVM selftests Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 01/21] KVM: selftests: Allocate pgd in virt_map() as necessary Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 02/21] KVM: selftests: Expose functions to get default sregs values Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 03/21] KVM: selftests: Expose function to allocate guest vCPU stack Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 04/21] KVM: selftests: Update kvm_init_vm_address_properties() for TDX Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 05/21] KVM: selftests: Expose segment definitons to assembly files Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 06/21] KVM: selftests: Add kbuild definitons Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 07/21] KVM: selftests: Define structs to pass parameters to TDX boot code Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 08/21] KVM: selftests: Add " Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 09/21] KVM: selftests: Set up TDX boot code region Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 10/21] KVM: selftests: Set up TDX boot parameters region Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 11/21] KVM: selftests: Add helper to initialize TDX VM Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 12/21] KVM: selftests: TDX: Use KVM_TDX_CAPABILITIES to validate TDs' attribute configuration Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 13/21] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to init TDX memory and finalize VM Sagi Shahar
2025-10-15 16:27 ` Ira Weiny
2025-10-23 23:59 ` Sagi Shahar
2025-10-24 16:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-24 16:45 ` Sagi Shahar
2025-10-24 17:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 14/21] KVM: selftests: Call TDX init when creating a new TDX vm Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 15/21] KVM: selftests: Setup memory regions for TDX on vm creation Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 16/21] KVM: selftests: Call KVM_TDX_INIT_VCPU when creating a new TDX vcpu Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 17/21] KVM: selftests: Set entry point for TDX guest code Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 18/21] KVM: selftests: Add support for TDX TDCALL from guest Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 19/21] KVM: selftests: Add wrapper for TDX MMIO " Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 20/21] KVM: selftests: Add ucall support for TDX Sagi Shahar
2025-09-25 17:28 ` [PATCH v11 21/21] KVM: selftests: Add TDX lifecycle test Sagi Shahar
2025-10-24 16:18 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-10-27 22:58 ` Ira Weiny
2025-10-27 23:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-28 0:53 ` Sagi Shahar
2025-10-28 17:12 ` Ira Weiny
2025-10-28 14:56 ` Ira Weiny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPum5qJjFH49YVyy@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=afranji@google.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=chenyi.qiang@intel.com \
--cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pratikrajesh.sampat@amd.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=runanwang@google.com \
--cc=sagis@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.