From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Bin Guo" <guobin@linux.alibaba.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, farosas@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] migration: Don't free the reason after calling migrate_add_blocker
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 12:17:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPumkKBx4PoGSwNv@x1.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v7k4xuhk.fsf@pond.sub.org>
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 04:08:39PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> But wow, the migrate_add_blocker API design is unpleasant with its
> >> pair of "Error **" parameters - it is practically designed to
> >> maximise confusion & surprise.
> >
> > It's quite a sight, isn't it?
> >
> > I'll give it a quick Friday afternoon try.
>
> Alright, my confusion has been maximised. Giving up on this.
Besides the use of two Error** that might be confusing, what is more
confusing (if not wrong..): migrate_add_blocker() will take ownership of
the 1st Error**, no matter whether the helper succeeded or not. However, it
only resets the first Error** if failed.
I think it means if migrate_add_blocker() succeeded, the caller will have a
non-NULL pointer, even if it has lost the ownership of that pointer.
I'm guessing it never caused issue only because we don't usually
error_free() the migration blocker anywhere.. but I think maybe we should
at least do an error_copy() in add_blockers()..
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-24 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-24 9:28 [PATCH] migration: Don't free the reason after calling migrate_add_blocker Bin Guo
2025-10-24 11:15 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-10-24 11:27 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-10-24 13:41 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-10-24 14:08 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-10-24 16:17 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2025-10-24 16:31 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-10-24 18:15 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-27 10:25 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-10-27 12:32 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-10-27 13:54 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-24 11:53 ` Bin Guo
2025-10-24 13:40 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPumkKBx4PoGSwNv@x1.local \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=guobin@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.