Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm, swap: misc cleanup and bugfix

[Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>]

On 10/24/25 at 09:26pm, Kairui Song wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 9:18 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
> <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 02:00:38AM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
> > > A few cleanups and a bugfix that are either suitable after the swap
> > > table phase I or found during code review.
> > >
> > > Patch 1 is a bugfix and needs to be included in the stable branch,
> > > the rest have no behavior change.
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - Update commit message for patch 1, it's a sub-optimal fix and a better
> > >   fix can be done later. [ Chris Li ]
> > > - Fix a lock balance issue in patch 1. [ YoungJun Park ]
> > > - Add a trivial cleanup patch to remove an unused argument,
> > >   no behavior change.
> > > - Update kernel doc.
> > > - Fix minor issue with commit message [ Nhat Pham ]
> > > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251007-swap-clean-after-swap-table-p1-v1-0-74860ef8ba74@tencent.com
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Kairui Song (5):
> > >       mm, swap: do not perform synchronous discard during allocation
> >
> > FYI For some reason this commit is not present on lore, see [0]
> >
> > [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251024-swap-clean-after-swap-table-p1-v2-0-a709469052e7@tencent.com/
> 
> Thanks for letting me know, strangely, it is here:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251024-swap-clean-after-swap-table-p1-v2-1-c5b0e1092927@tencent.com

I don't receive the patch 1/5, thanks to the link.

> 
> But the In-reply-to id is wrong. I'm using b4 and somehow patch 1 was
> blocked by gmail's SMTP so I had to try to resend patch 1 again,
> something went wrong with that part. I'll try to find out the problem
> and avoid that from happening again.
> 
> I'm seeing that patch 1 is being merged into mm tree just fine, I
> guess that should be OK.
> 
> If anyone is reading the threads, this url above should be helpful.
>