From: Ankit Khushwaha <ankitkhushwaha.linux@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Bala-Vignesh-Reddy <reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/user_events: Avoid taking address of packed member in perf_test
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 22:28:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQD2Igc3svAF3klc@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251027162521.c56c7f89f6ad4e3d639c408c@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 04:25:21PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:04:39 +0530 Ankit Khushwaha <ankitkhushwaha.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Accessing 'reg.write_index' directly triggers a -Waddress-of-packed-member
> > warning due to potential unaligned pointer access:
> >
> > perf_test.c:239:38: warning: taking address of packed member 'write_index'
> > of class or structure 'user_reg' may result in an unaligned pointer value
> > [-Waddress-of-packed-member]
> > 239 | ASSERT_NE(-1, write(self->data_fd, ®.write_index,
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Use memcpy() instead to safely copy the value and avoid unaligned pointer
> > access across architectures.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/user_events/perf_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/user_events/perf_test.c
> > @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ TEST_F(user, perf_empty_events) {
> > struct perf_event_mmap_page *perf_page;
> > int page_size = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
> > int id, fd;
> > + __u32 write_index;
> > __u32 *val;
> >
> > reg.size = sizeof(reg);
> > @@ -236,7 +237,8 @@ TEST_F(user, perf_empty_events) {
> > ASSERT_EQ(1 << reg.enable_bit, self->check);
> >
> > /* Ensure write shows up at correct offset */
> > - ASSERT_NE(-1, write(self->data_fd, ®.write_index,
> > + memcpy(&write_index, ®.write_index, sizeof(reg.write_index));
> > + ASSERT_NE(-1, write(self->data_fd, &write_index,
> > sizeof(reg.write_index)));
>
> Simply casting &write_index to void* would fix this?
yes, this hides the type mismatch from the compiler. But i think
casting to void * will not fix the alignment mismatch for packed struct.
It works on x86, but might break on other platform.
>
> > val = (void *)(((char *)perf_page) + perf_page->data_offset);
> > ASSERT_EQ(PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE, *val);
Thanks
Ankit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-28 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-27 11:34 [PATCH] selftests/user_events: Avoid taking address of packed member in perf_test Ankit Khushwaha
2025-10-27 23:25 ` Andrew Morton
2025-10-28 16:58 ` Ankit Khushwaha [this message]
2025-10-28 20:26 ` Andrew Morton
2025-10-29 15:20 ` Ankit Khushwaha
2025-11-01 3:19 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQD2Igc3svAF3klc@fedora \
--to=ankitkhushwaha.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.