Re: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce DRM_RAS using generic netlink for RAS

[Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>]

On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 02:38:47PM -0600, Zack McKevitt wrote:
> I think this looks good, adding telemetry functionality as a node type and
> in the yaml spec looks straightforward (despite some potential naming
> awkwardness with the RAS module). Thanks for adding this.
> 
> Have you considered how this might work for containerized workloads?
> Specifically, I think it would be best if the underlying drm_ras nodes are
> only accessible for containerized workloads where the device has been
> explicitly passed in. Do you know if this is handled automatically with the
> existing netlink implementation? I imagine that this would be of interest to
> the broader community outside of Qualcomm as well.
> 
> > Also, it is worth to mention that we have a in-tree pyynl/cli.py tool that entirely
> > exercises this new API, hence I hope this can be the reference code for the uAPI
> > usage, while we continue with the plan of introducing IGT tests and tools for this
> > and adjusting the internal vendor tools to open with open source developments and
> > changing them to support these flows.
> 
> I think it would be nice to see some accompanying userspace code that makes
> use of this implementation to have as a reference if at all possible.

Yes, we are going to provide a true userspace IGT tool that exercise that directly
instead of only relying on the provided netlink  pyynl/cli.py.

Develop is in progress, but sorry for the delay here.

> 
> As a side note, I will be on vacation for a couple of weeks as of this
> weekend and my response time will be affected.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Zack