From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
joey.gouly@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
shuah@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BITS and its last user
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 13:45:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQJ8so_oAXfeyxn_@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251014102108.2442391-3-ben.horgan@arm.com>
Hi Ben,
On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 11:21:07AM +0100, Ben Horgan wrote:
> ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BITS is set to 4 but not all ID register fields are 4
> bits. See for instance ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1. The last user of this define,
> ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BITS, is the set_id_regs selftest. Its logic assumes
> the fields aren't a single bits; assert that's the case and stop using the
> define. As there are no more users, ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BITS is removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 2 --
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c | 8 ++++++--
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index 6455db1b54fd..d9aa76d08e13 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -1129,8 +1129,6 @@
> #define gicr_insn(insn) read_sysreg_s(GICV5_OP_GICR_##insn)
> #define gic_insn(v, insn) write_sysreg_s(v, GICV5_OP_GIC_##insn)
>
> -#define ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BITS 4
> -
> #ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> .macro mrs_s, rt, sreg
You can send this diff as a separate patch. Selftests actually uses the
definition from tools/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h, so you'll want to
drop that definition along with the change to set_id_regs.
Thanks,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-29 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-14 10:21 [PATCH 0/3] set_id_regs cleanup Ben Horgan
2025-10-14 10:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: selftests: Count test_guest_reg_read() as a test Ben Horgan
2025-10-29 20:48 ` Oliver Upton
2025-10-30 9:36 ` Ben Horgan
2025-10-14 10:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BITS and its last user Ben Horgan
2025-10-29 20:45 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2025-10-30 9:40 ` Ben Horgan
2025-10-14 10:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: arm64: selftests: Consider all 7 possible levels of cache Ben Horgan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQJ8so_oAXfeyxn_@linux.dev \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.