Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] perf/x86/intel/cstate: Add Clearwater Forest support

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>]

* Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com> wrote:

> Clearwater Forest is based on the Darkmont Atom microarchitecture.
> From the perspective of C-state residency profiling, it supports the
> same residency counters as Sierra Forest: CC1/CC6, PC2/PC6, and MC6.
> 
> Please note that the C1E residency counter can only be read via PMT,
> not MSR. Therefore, tools relying on the perf_event framework cannot
> access the C1E residency.
> 
> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw.linux@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>

So, this is not a valid SOB chain: primary author should be the first 
SOB, or if it was co-developed, it should have the proper 
Co-developed-by tags.

Here I can see two possibilities:

(1) if Zhenyu Wang was the primary author, and Zide Chen reviewed, 
    tested and submitted it upstream, then:


  | From: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
  | Subject: [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/intel/cstate: Add Clearwater Forest support

    From: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw.linux@gmail.com>
    ...

    Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw.linux@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>

(I.e. add the extra From line as the first line of the changelog.)

(2) if it was co-developed, with Zhenyu Wang and Zide Chen having each 
    written unique lines of code of their own that finally resulted in 
    this submission, then:

  | From: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
  | Subject: [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/intel/cstate: Add Clearwater Forest support

    ...

    Co-developed-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
    Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
    Co-developed-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw.linux@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw.linux@gmail.com>

Which one was it? :-)

Thanks,

	Ingo